27.09.2014 Views

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Philippine Tariff Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Philippine Tariff Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Philippine Tariff Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>EXECUTIVE</strong> <strong>SUMMARY</strong><br />

Safeguard action<br />

against imports of<br />

testliner boards<br />

This is a report on the formal investigation conducted by the<br />

<strong>Tariff</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> under Section 9 of the Republic Act No.<br />

8800 (otherwise known as the “Safeguard Measures Act”) on<br />

the petition filed by the domestic testliner board industry<br />

represented by United Pulp and Paper Co., Inc. (UPPC)<br />

against imported testliner boards from various countries<br />

classified under ASEAN Harmonized <strong>Tariff</strong> Nomenclature<br />

(AHTN) Code Nos. 4805.24.00, 4805.25.10 and 4805.25.90.<br />

This report addresses the issue on whether definitive general<br />

safeguard action, in accordance with Republic Act No. 8800<br />

and the WTO Agreement on Safeguards, would be justified<br />

against imports of testliner boards.<br />

Period of<br />

Investigation (POI)<br />

For purposes of the <strong>Commission</strong>’s formal investigation, the<br />

POI was extended up to the most recent period, i.e., up to<br />

June 2010, for which data are available. This is in<br />

accordance with the requirement by the WTO Appellate Body<br />

(Argentina - Footwear) that it is necessary for investigating<br />

authorities to examine recent imports, and not simply trends<br />

in imports during the past five (5) years or for that matter,<br />

during any other period of several years.<br />

Findings and<br />

conclusions...<br />

The <strong>Commission</strong>, in accordance with RA 8800 and the WTO<br />

Agreement on Safeguards, concludes that:<br />

i) UPPC accounted for 63% of the total domestic<br />

production of testliner board from 2004 to 2009;<br />

ii) locally produced testliner board is a like product to<br />

imported testliner board;<br />

iii) the product under consideration was imported in<br />

significantly increased quantities, both in absolute terms<br />

i


and relative to domestic production, from 2005 through<br />

2008. Imports peaked in the first six (6) months of 2010;<br />

iv) the domestic testliner board industry suffered and is<br />

suffering significant impairment in its overall condition in<br />

terms of shrinking market share; declining production and<br />

sales; underutilization of rated capacity and operating<br />

losses; and<br />

v) while there were other factors that contributed to the<br />

impairment of the overall condition of the domestic<br />

testliner board industry, increased importations of the<br />

product under consideration were the substantial cause<br />

of serious injury to the domestic industry.<br />

The imposition of a<br />

definitive safeguard<br />

measure<br />

The existence of a causal link between the increased imports<br />

of testliner board and serious injury to the domestic industry<br />

having been established, the <strong>Commission</strong> recommends a<br />

specific safeguard duty of P 1,342/MT. The measure shall be<br />

effective for three (3) years starting 16 September 2010, i.e.,<br />

the date when the provisional measure took effect.<br />

ii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!