Geometry Optimisation with CASTEP
Geometry Optimisation with CASTEP
Geometry Optimisation with CASTEP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Next: A Variable Cell calculation Up: <strong>Geometry</strong> <strong>Optimisation</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>CASTEP</strong> Previous: Other output<br />
files<br />
Checking the absolute convergence of<br />
our Bulk Silicon Calculation<br />
The example calculation <strong>with</strong> bulk silicon does not produce a very accurate answer. Can it be improved?<br />
There are two main sources of error in our calculation;<br />
●<br />
●<br />
Fundamental errors associated <strong>with</strong> the approximations used in the calculation such as the use of<br />
the LDA.<br />
Systematic errors associated <strong>with</strong> inaccuracies in the wavefunctions introduced by using a finite<br />
basis set and wavefunction sampling in reciprocal space.<br />
The latter of these must be reduced to a minimum. To show how this might be done I have repeated the<br />
calculation several times <strong>with</strong> increasing precision in the basis set and <strong>with</strong> various MP grid densities.<br />
Figure 3 below shows the total energy as a function of the basis set size for calculations <strong>with</strong> 1, 10, 28<br />
and 60 K-Points. (See the section on variable cell calculations for a neat trick to efficiently perform many<br />
singlepoint energy calculations at a variety of cutoff energies at a fixed k-point density).