14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3. MODEL AND METHODS 89<br />

and that ∣ ∣ S<br />

2<br />

α,β<br />

∣ ∣ is independent of the choice of α and β. Therefore it is<br />

meaningful to define the following quantity<br />

S =<br />

√ ∣∣S<br />

2<br />

α,β<br />

∣ ∣ (4.8)<br />

which we will use for the evaluation of the superconducting order parameter.<br />

4.3.4 RVB mean-field theory of superconductivity<br />

The most systematic approach up to date to formulate an RVB mean field theory<br />

is based on the slave boson representation which factorizes the electron operators<br />

into charge and spin parts c † iσ = f † iσ b i called holons and spinons. The charged<br />

boson operator b i destroys an empty site (hole) and f † iσ is a fermionic creation<br />

operator which carries the spin of the physical electron. The constraint of no<br />

doubly occupied site can now be implemented by requiring ∑ σ f † iσ f iσ + b † i b i =1<br />

at each site. In the slave boson formalism the t–J model becomes [20]<br />

H = −t ∑<br />

〈i,j〉σ<br />

(<br />

)<br />

f † iσ f jσb † j b i +h.c. + J ∑ (<br />

S i · S j − n in j<br />

4<br />

〈i,j〉<br />

∑<br />

− µ 0 n i + ∑<br />

i<br />

i<br />

λ i<br />

( ∑<br />

σ<br />

)<br />

f † iσ f iσ + b † i b i − 1<br />

)<br />

(4.9)<br />

where S i =1/2 ∑ σσ<br />

f † ′ iσ σ σσ ′f iσ ′ and n i = ∑ σ f † iσ f jσ. This Hamiltonian is gauge<br />

invariant by simultaneous local transformation of the holon and spinon operators<br />

f iσ → f iσ e iϕ i<br />

and b iσ → b iσ e iϕ i<br />

. Now one can make a mean field approximation<br />

by a decoupling in a series of expectation values χ ij = ∑ 〈 〉<br />

σ<br />

f † iσ f jσ , ∆ ij =<br />

∑<br />

〈 〉<br />

σ 〈f i↑f j↓ − f i↓ f j↑ 〉 and B i = b † i . To have a superconducting state in the slave<br />

boson representation it is not sufficient that the fermions form Cooper pairs but<br />

also the bosons need to be in a coherent state of a Bose condensate. On the square<br />

lattice one finds [20] that the particle–particle expectation values have d–wave<br />

symmetry, i.e. ∆ x = −∆ y . The mean field phase diagram suggests some phase<br />

transitions, however χ ij ,∆ ij ,andB i cannot be true order parameters since they<br />

are not gauge invariant. In fact Ubbens and Lee [109] have shown that gauge<br />

fluctuations destroy completely these phases and only a d–wave superconducting<br />

dome is left over. Moreover these fluctuations diminish also the tendency for<br />

superconductivity and seem to destroy it completely near half–filling where they<br />

believe that it is unstable towards more complicated phases such as a staggered<br />

flux phase.<br />

In this section we will use a simplified version of the previously mentioned<br />

RVB theory. Despite of its simplicity this theory should nevertheless predict<br />

the correct symmetry of the superconducting order parameter and be able to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!