pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.3. MODEL AND METHODS 89<br />
and that ∣ ∣ S<br />
2<br />
α,β<br />
∣ ∣ is independent of the choice of α and β. Therefore it is<br />
meaningful to define the following quantity<br />
S =<br />
√ ∣∣S<br />
2<br />
α,β<br />
∣ ∣ (4.8)<br />
which we will use for the evaluation of the superconducting order parameter.<br />
4.3.4 RVB mean-field theory of superconductivity<br />
The most systematic approach up to date to formulate an RVB mean field theory<br />
is based on the slave boson representation which factorizes the electron operators<br />
into charge and spin parts c † iσ = f † iσ b i called holons and spinons. The charged<br />
boson operator b i destroys an empty site (hole) and f † iσ is a fermionic creation<br />
operator which carries the spin of the physical electron. The constraint of no<br />
doubly occupied site can now be implemented by requiring ∑ σ f † iσ f iσ + b † i b i =1<br />
at each site. In the slave boson formalism the t–J model becomes [20]<br />
H = −t ∑<br />
〈i,j〉σ<br />
(<br />
)<br />
f † iσ f jσb † j b i +h.c. + J ∑ (<br />
S i · S j − n in j<br />
4<br />
〈i,j〉<br />
∑<br />
− µ 0 n i + ∑<br />
i<br />
i<br />
λ i<br />
( ∑<br />
σ<br />
)<br />
f † iσ f iσ + b † i b i − 1<br />
)<br />
(4.9)<br />
where S i =1/2 ∑ σσ<br />
f † ′ iσ σ σσ ′f iσ ′ and n i = ∑ σ f † iσ f jσ. This Hamiltonian is gauge<br />
invariant by simultaneous local transformation of the holon and spinon operators<br />
f iσ → f iσ e iϕ i<br />
and b iσ → b iσ e iϕ i<br />
. Now one can make a mean field approximation<br />
by a decoupling in a series of expectation values χ ij = ∑ 〈 〉<br />
σ<br />
f † iσ f jσ , ∆ ij =<br />
∑<br />
〈 〉<br />
σ 〈f i↑f j↓ − f i↓ f j↑ 〉 and B i = b † i . To have a superconducting state in the slave<br />
boson representation it is not sufficient that the fermions form Cooper pairs but<br />
also the bosons need to be in a coherent state of a Bose condensate. On the square<br />
lattice one finds [20] that the particle–particle expectation values have d–wave<br />
symmetry, i.e. ∆ x = −∆ y . The mean field phase diagram suggests some phase<br />
transitions, however χ ij ,∆ ij ,andB i cannot be true order parameters since they<br />
are not gauge invariant. In fact Ubbens and Lee [109] have shown that gauge<br />
fluctuations destroy completely these phases and only a d–wave superconducting<br />
dome is left over. Moreover these fluctuations diminish also the tendency for<br />
superconductivity and seem to destroy it completely near half–filling where they<br />
believe that it is unstable towards more complicated phases such as a staggered<br />
flux phase.<br />
In this section we will use a simplified version of the previously mentioned<br />
RVB theory. Despite of its simplicity this theory should nevertheless predict<br />
the correct symmetry of the superconducting order parameter and be able to