14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 CHAPTER 2. NUMERICAL METHODS<br />

The following change in the eigenvalues are obtained with first order perturbation<br />

theory:<br />

λ i = λ 0i + x T 0i ([δK]) x 0i, (2.53)<br />

and the eigenvectors are given by:<br />

x i = x 0i + ∑ j≠i<br />

x T 0i ([δK]) x 0j<br />

λ 0i − λ 0j<br />

x 0j (2.54)<br />

The derivatives are easily obtained from these formulae. In the case of degenerate<br />

eigenvectors, the above formulae are no longer valid, and a more general<br />

degenerate perturbation theory should be considered.<br />

Research on the derivative of degenerate eigenvectors has been an area of significant<br />

interest in recent years. Engineer have focused on the study of the so<br />

called sensitivities, that are simply the derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors<br />

with respect to design parameters that make the matrix evolve. Degenerate eigenvalues<br />

are unavoidable in practice, and, for instance, appear in the calculation of<br />

the derivatives of the eigenvectors of the BCS Hamiltonian.<br />

We sketch only here the main results obtained for the derivate of a degenerate<br />

eigenvector (for more details the reader is referred to Ref. [53,54,55,56]). Let us<br />

assume without loss of generality that the first eigenvalue λ 1 is degenerate with<br />

multiplicity r. We define Φ as the matrix containing all the eigenvectors, Φ 1 as<br />

the matrix of the degenerate eigenvectors, and Φ 2 as the matrix containing the<br />

other vectors. With this definitions we have the trivial identity:<br />

[ ]<br />

Φ T λ1 1<br />

K 0 (p)Φ=Λ= r 0<br />

, (2.55)<br />

0 Λ 2<br />

It can be proved that the derivative of the degenerate eigenvectors φ 1 is :<br />

Φ ′ 1 =Φ 2 (λ 1 I − Λ 2 ) −1 Φ T 2 D jΦ 1 (2.56)<br />

Knowing the derivative of the U and V matrices allows to measure the O k observables<br />

of equation (2.40) and the stochastic minimization procedure is now<br />

well defined.<br />

2.3.3 Correlated measurement minimization<br />

One limitation of the stochastic minimization method, in our present implementation,<br />

is that the formulae obtained for the derivation of a determinant are not<br />

valid for the more general Pfaffian wavefunction, since there is no simple formula<br />

for the derivative of a Pfaffian (see equation (2.48)). Therefore, in the case<br />

of a Pfaffian Monte Carlo simulations, the gradients of the energy with respect<br />

to the variational parameters have to computed numerically. This task is very<br />

heavy and limits the minimization to a few parameters (about 10 parameters at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!