14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1. VARIATIONAL MONTE CARLO 37<br />

wherewehavedefined: A ij =(D i,j − D j,i ). The Pfaffian of a skew matrix is<br />

related to the determinant [46]:<br />

P f (A) 2 =det(A) (2.29)<br />

However, the sign of the Pfaffian is not given by this relation and further algorithms<br />

to compute the Pfaffian of a squew matrix must be used. In conclusion, we<br />

find that the wavefunction projected on a real basis state when collinear/triplet<br />

pairing are present is the Pfaffian of the real-space configuration anti-symmetrized<br />

matrix A:<br />

〈α | ψ var 〉 = P f (A)<br />

A i,j = f (ki ,k j ,σ i ,σ j ) − f (kj ,k i ,σ j ,σ i )<br />

(2.30)<br />

where P f (A) denotes the Pfaffian of the matrix A. Using this last relation, the<br />

wavefunction can now be evaluated numerically using a Monte Carlo procedure<br />

with Pfaffian updates, as introduced in Ref. [47]. In the particular case where<br />

f k,l,↑,↑ = f k,l,↓,↓ =0andatS z = 0 (this happens if the BCS pairing is of singlet<br />

type and the magnetic order is collinear), the Pfaffian reduces to a simple determinant,<br />

and the methods becomes equivalent to the standard Variational Monte<br />

Carlo [42] technique.<br />

However, in the simulation we have to calculate the ratio of the two Pfaffians<br />

of matrices Q and R that correspond to two different real-space configurations.<br />

One of the main problem is that the sign of the Pfaffian is not given by the<br />

general formula P f (Q) 2 =det(Q). However, it was shown by the mathematician<br />

Arthur Cayley in 1849 that the ratio of the Pfaffian of two skew matrices, that<br />

differ only by the column and the line i, is given by [48]:<br />

P f (Q)<br />

P f (R) = det(S)<br />

det(R)<br />

(2.31)<br />

Where the matrix R is distinct from the matrix Q only by the line and the column<br />

i, and the matrix S is distinct from the matrix R only by the column i. When<br />

moving the particle labeled by index i fromonesitetoanothersite,thelineand<br />

the column of the matrix A in equation (2.30) must be changed, and thus formula<br />

(2.31) can be used. The ratio of the determinants can still be calculated with the<br />

method of Ceperley [42]:<br />

det(S)<br />

det(Q) =<br />

∑<br />

j=1,2N<br />

c j<br />

(<br />

Q<br />

−1 ) j,i<br />

(2.32)<br />

where c is the updated column of matrix Q. Finally, we note that in the case<br />

when f ij↑↑ = f ij↓↓ = 0, the matrix Q reduces to diagonal blocks:<br />

( )<br />

0 B<br />

A =<br />

−B T ⇒ P<br />

0<br />

f (A) =detB (2.33)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!