14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1. VARIATIONAL MONTE CARLO 35<br />

55<br />

N particle<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

∆=<br />

0<br />

∆=0.05<br />

∆=0.<br />

1<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

Chemical<br />

Potential<br />

2.0<br />

Figure 2.1: Number of particle in the non-projected RVB wavefunction versus<br />

the chemical potential when the pairing is ∆ = 0, and for finite pairing in a<br />

three band hubbard model. When ∆ = 0 + , some of the numbers of particle are<br />

forbidden due to the degenarate shells. In contrast, when ∆ > 0thenumberof<br />

particles evolves smoothly with the chemical potential.<br />

In the language of the non-projected RVB wavefunction this will give plateaus<br />

in the number of particles versus the chemical potential (see Fig. 2.1) when<br />

the pairing parameters vanish. Indeed, when the chemical potential reaches the<br />

energy of a degenerate shell, all the particles in the plateau are filled and the<br />

number of particles changes discontinuously. These spurious degeneracies can be<br />

left out for the case of one band theories by considering rotated lattices : for<br />

these lattices the k-vectors move out of the degenerate shells. This cannot be<br />

done for more complicated multi-band theories, like for the three-band Hubbard<br />

model discussed in Chapter 6. Nevertheless, when the pairing parameters are<br />

finite, the number of particles is moving continuously with the chemical potential<br />

and it is always possible to impose a fixed number of particles in the variational<br />

wavefunction. It is therefore often more efficient to consider a small residual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!