pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.4. MICROSCOPIC MODELS FOR THE CUPRATES 25<br />
To illustrate our future strategy, let us recall in more details the simple basis<br />
of the RVB theory. Anderson propose to write the exchange part of the t−J<br />
model in terms of singlet creation operators:<br />
b + i,j |0〉 = c+ i↓ c+ j↑ − c+ i↑ c+ j↓<br />
√<br />
2<br />
|0〉 = 1 √<br />
2<br />
(|↓ i ↑ j 〉−|↑ i ↓ j 〉) (1.9)<br />
This leads to the following equivalent Hamiltonian :<br />
H t−J = −t ∑<br />
b † i,j b i,j (1.10)<br />
〈i,j〉σ<br />
c † iσ c jσ − J ∑ 〈i,j〉<br />
In this language, the exchange term of the t−J model can be seen as a term<br />
that condenses singlets. A simple mean-field decoupling of the singlet creation<br />
operator was proposed by P.W. Anderson:<br />
∆ i,j = 〈b i,j 〉 0<br />
(1.11)<br />
The mean-field hamiltonian is:<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
H MF = −t ∑<br />
′ c † iσ c jσ − J ⎝ ∑ 〈b † i,j 〉b i,j + b † i,j 〈b i,j〉 + 〈b † i,j 〉〈b i,j〉 ⎠ (1.12)<br />
〈i,j〉σ<br />
〈i,j〉<br />
And if the quantum fluctuations around the mean-field value are small, the final<br />
mean-field Hamiltonian reads:<br />
H MF = ∑ )<br />
)<br />
ε k<br />
(c † kσ c kσ + c.c. +<br />
(∆ k c † k↑ c† −k↓ + c.c. (1.13)<br />
k<br />
Therefore the BCS mean-field theory is recovered as a mean-field theory of the<br />
t−J model. The pairing order parameter assumed above is defined in real<br />
space. For example, when ∆ is isotropic the Fourier transform of the pairing<br />
leads to the so called s-wave symmetry, and for the square lattice we get<br />
∆ k =∆(cos(k x )+cos(k y )). In the case when ∆ ij has alternating sign on the<br />
square lattice (+1 on the horizontal bonds and −1 on the vertical bonds) the<br />
Fourier transform gives the d-wave pairing symmetry ∆ k =∆(cos(k x ) − cos(k y )).<br />
The BCS wave-function has the peculiar property that it is a superposition of<br />
different numbers of particle states. Even more relevant, the full projection that<br />
forbids doubly occupied sites in the t−J model is not taken into account by the<br />
simple mean-field decoupling. Therefore, we have to remove the doubly occupied<br />
site of the wave-function. As a first step, the wave-function is written in real<br />
space :<br />
|ψ〉 = ∏ ( ∏<br />
(<br />
uk + v k c + k↑ −k↓) c+ |0〉 ∝ 1+ v )<br />
k<br />
c + k↑<br />
u c+ −k↓<br />
|0〉 (1.14)<br />
k<br />
k∈BZ<br />
k∈BZ