14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.4. MICROSCOPIC MODELS FOR THE CUPRATES 23<br />

The mapping of the Hubbard model on the t−J modelisdonebyusing<br />

a unitary transformation e iS that decouples the Hilbert space of the Hubbard<br />

Hamiltonian so that there are no connections between the subspaces with different<br />

numbers of doubly occupied sites. This transformation is an expansion in (t/U),<br />

so that the subspaces are decoupled at each order. At first order, the operator<br />

Ŝ is given by Ŝ = − 1 (F iU +1 − F −1 ), where F 1 (F −1 ) is the part of the kinetic<br />

operator that increases (decreases) the number of doubly occupied sites by unity.<br />

The spin operator in the fermionic language can be more easily understood<br />

by its effect on single-particle fermionic states. We consider first the dot product<br />

of the spin operators :<br />

S i · S j = 1 2<br />

(<br />

S<br />

+<br />

i S− j<br />

+ S − i S+ j<br />

)<br />

+ S<br />

z<br />

i S z j (1.5)<br />

S + i<br />

, when applied a fermion with spin down, is equivalent to a spin-flip process :<br />

S + i<br />

(<br />

c<br />

+<br />

i↓ |0〉) = c + i↑<br />

|0〉 (1.6)<br />

On the other hand, the up fermion state is contained in the Kernel of the S + i<br />

operator:<br />

(<br />

S i<br />

+ c<br />

+<br />

i↑ |0〉) =0 (1.7)<br />

And finally Si<br />

z is diagonal and gives the spin of the fermion state:<br />

S z i<br />

(<br />

c<br />

+<br />

iσ |0〉 ) = σ ( c + iσ |0〉) (1.8)<br />

Finally, the exchange coupling J is obtained from the canonical transformation<br />

of the Hubbard model and is given by J =4t 2 /U. When the on-site repulsion<br />

is very large the exchange process of two neighbors up and down spins vanishes.<br />

This is intuitive, since the exchange of two fermions is a second order process<br />

that makes an up fermion hop on the same site than a down fermion. In the<br />

limit when U is small, the canonical transformation is no longer valid, since the<br />

Hilbert sector containing the single occupied site is no longer decoupled from<br />

the highest energy states. Finally, let us note that the exchange coupling J is<br />

antiferromagnetic.<br />

To illustrate the physics of the t−J model, we consider first a simple toy<br />

model of two Heisenberg spin coupled through an antiferromagnetic coupling<br />

J: H = J ∑ 〈i,j〉<br />

S i · S j . The ground-state for this model is a singlet with energy<br />

E = −3J/4, and the higher energy state is a triplet with energy E = J/4. A<br />

naive expectation, when dealing with antiferromagnetic quantum spin systems,<br />

is that the ground state in one or two dimensions might be therefore a singlet as<br />

well. It is worth looking at the energy of the singlet state in the one dimensional<br />

spin-1/2 case, since in this limit the exact solution is known (Bethe Ansatz).<br />

The spin-1/2 system is gapless, in contrary with the spin-1 chain that is gapped

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!