14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194 APPENDIX B. A PAIR OF PARTICLES IN A CUO 4 CLUSTER<br />

Nevertheless, we found in the three-band Hubbard model that the wavefunction<br />

with (α 1 ,α 2 ) lying in the long-dashed rectangular box of Fig.B.2 was optimal.<br />

This later wavefunction has a current pattern which is similar to the θ 2<br />

phase of C.Varma, but has reversed current lines on the oxygen-oxygen bonds,<br />

and the amplitude of these lines is small. On the other hand, we measured the<br />

corresponding mean-field operator that are defined by :<br />

ĵ MF<br />

kl<br />

= ∑ σ<br />

it kl e iθ kl<br />

c † iσ c jσ + c.c.<br />

(B.11)<br />

ˆK MF<br />

kl<br />

= ∑ σ<br />

t kl e iθ kl<br />

c † iσ c jσ + c.c.<br />

(B.12)<br />

We show in Fig.B.3 the range of parameters (α 1 ,α 2 ) that are stabilized in variational<br />

Monte-Carlo calculations (short-dashed rectangular box). For the corresponding<br />

range of parameters the mean-field current operator is identical to<br />

the θ 2 phase of C. Varma, with strong currents on the oxygen-oxygen bonds. In<br />

conclusion, the variational calculations stabilize a wavefunction that has a flux<br />

through the periodic boundaries and a weak current on the oxygen-oxygen links<br />

when the physical current observable ĵ is considered, but the same wavefunction<br />

would have a true current circulation inside the triangle plaquettes when the<br />

mean-field current operator j MF is measured in this same wavefunction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!