14.09.2014 Views

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 9 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

106 CHAPTER 4. HONEYCOMB LATTICE<br />

0.06<br />

0.05<br />

2-leg ladder<br />

(2,0) tube<br />

(2,1) tube<br />

2D square lattice<br />

2D honeycomb lattice<br />

0.04<br />

∆<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0.00<br />

0.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

hole doping δ<br />

0.5<br />

0.6<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.0<br />

∆ y<br />

∆ x<br />

/∆ y<br />

-1.5<br />

Zhang theory<br />

∆ x<br />

-2.0<br />

-2.5<br />

-3.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.1<br />

0.2<br />

0.3<br />

0.4<br />

hole doping δ<br />

0.5<br />

0.6<br />

Figure 4.14: Top: Pairing amplitude obtained from the pairing operator correlations<br />

in the projected variational wavefunction. When the pairing amplitude<br />

is anisotropic, the maximum value of the pairing along the different directions is<br />

shown. Inset: the symmetry of the pairing in the 2-leg ladder is shown. The pairing<br />

is stronger along the arms of the ladder, and is with opposite sign and weaker<br />

amplitude in the vertical direction. The pairing amplitude obtained in the two<br />

dimensional square lattice (open circles) and honeycomb lattice (blue circles) are<br />

shown for comparison. Bottom: the ratio ∆ x /∆ y is shown for the 2-leg ladder.<br />

S.C. Zhang predict that ∆ x = −2∆ y in the limit of zero doping [121]. We find<br />

within the variational results a ratio ≈ 2.2, which is not very far from the theory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!