14.09.2014 Views

CASINO manual - Theory of Condensed Matter

CASINO manual - Theory of Condensed Matter

CASINO manual - Theory of Condensed Matter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19.4.3 1D Coulomb interaction<br />

Coulomb sums in systems that are periodic in one dimension (the x-direction, according to casino)<br />

are performed using an algorithm based on the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula.<br />

Such systems are done infrequently enough that it probably isn’t worth writing out all the theory<br />

here. Please refer to Ref. [40], particularly noting Eq. (4.8).<br />

Note that the first derivatives <strong>of</strong> the 1D Coulomb interaction have never been implemented in casino,<br />

so core-polarization potentials may not be used in one-dimensionally periodic systems with atoms.<br />

19.4.4 MPC interaction<br />

The model periodic Coulomb (MPC) interaction [41, 42, 30] is used to reduce finite size effects in<br />

periodic calculations. The exact MPC interaction operator is<br />

Ĥe−e exact = ∑ f(r i − r j ) + ∑ ∫<br />

ρ(r) [v E (r i − r) − f(r i − r)] dr<br />

i>j<br />

i WS<br />

− 1 ∫<br />

ρ(r)ρ(r ′ ) [v E (r − r ′ ) − f(r − r ′ )] dr dr ′ , (126)<br />

2<br />

WS<br />

where f(r) is the 1/r Coulomb interaction treated within the ‘minimum-image’ convention, which<br />

corresponds to reducing the vector r into the Wigner-Seitz (WS) cell <strong>of</strong> the simulation cell, v E is the<br />

Ewald potential, and ρ is the electronic charge density from the many-electron wave function Ψ. The<br />

electron–electron interaction energy is<br />

which gives<br />

Ee−e exact = 1 ∫<br />

ρ(r)ρ(r ′ )v E (r − r ′ ) dr dr ′<br />

2 WS<br />

⎛<br />

∫<br />

+ ⎝ |Ψ| ∑ 2 f(r i − r j ) Π k dr k − 1 ∫<br />

WS<br />

2<br />

i>j<br />

E exact<br />

e−e = 〈Ψ|Ĥexact e−e |Ψ〉 , (127)<br />

WS<br />

ρ(r)ρ(r ′ )f(r − r ′ ) dr dr ′ ⎞<br />

⎠ , (128)<br />

where the first term on the right-hand side is the Hartree energy and the term in brackets is the XC<br />

energy. We can see that the Hartree energy is calculated with the Ewald interaction while the XC<br />

energy (expressed as the difference between a full Coulomb term and a Hartree term) is calculated<br />

with the cut<strong>of</strong>f interaction f.<br />

In a DMC calculation we require the local energy at every step, but we only know the DMC charge<br />

density, ρ, at the end <strong>of</strong> the run. Normally we have a good approximation to the charge density, ρ A ,<br />

either from an independent particle calculation or a VMC calculation. We can avoid the need to know<br />

ρ exactly by constructing a new interaction operator which involves only ρ A ,<br />

Ĥ e−e = ∑ f(r i − r j ) + ∑ ∫<br />

ρ A (r) [v E (r i − r) − f(r i − r)] dr<br />

i>j<br />

i WS<br />

− 1 ∫<br />

ρ A (r)ρ A (r ′ ) [v E (r − r ′ ) − f(r − r ′ )] dr dr ′ . (129)<br />

2<br />

The interaction energy becomes<br />

Noting that<br />

WS<br />

E e−e = 〈Ψ|Ĥe−e|Ψ〉<br />

∫<br />

= ρ(r)ρ A (r ′ )v E (r − r ′ ) dr dr ′ − 1 ∫<br />

ρ A (r)ρ A (r ′ )v E (r − r ′ ) dr dr ′<br />

WS 2 WS<br />

∫<br />

+ |Ψ| ∑ ∫<br />

2 f(r i − r j ) Π k dr k − ρ(r)ρ A (r ′ )f(r − r ′ ) dr dr ′<br />

WS i>j<br />

WS<br />

+ 1 ∫<br />

ρ A (r)ρ A (r ′ )f(r − r ′ ) dr dr ′ . (130)<br />

2<br />

E e−e = E exact<br />

e−e − 1 2<br />

∫<br />

WS<br />

WS<br />

[ρ(r) − ρ A (r)] [ρ(r ′ ) − ρ A (r ′ )] [v E (r − r ′ ) − f(r − r ′ )] dr dr ′ , (131)<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!