14.09.2014 Views

CASINO manual - Theory of Condensed Matter

CASINO manual - Theory of Condensed Matter

CASINO manual - Theory of Condensed Matter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• By default, gaussian uses spin configurations (combinations <strong>of</strong> Slater determinants) in a<br />

CASSCF calculation. It is best to converge the CASSCF state that you want using this option.<br />

However, for input to the QMC code, the wave function must be in terms <strong>of</strong> Slater determinants.<br />

In principle, the ‘SlaterDet’ option to CASSCF will do this, but I never succeeded in getting it<br />

to work. Instead, specifying IOp(4/21=10) does the trick, as does IOp(4/46=3).<br />

• For large CASSCF calculations on the alpha cluster Columbus, the diagonalization method must<br />

be changed by specifying IOp(5/51=1).<br />

• In large CASSCF calculations where very many determinants are involved, gaussian currently<br />

only prints the first fifty determinants in the expansion (those with the largest coefficients).<br />

The significance <strong>of</strong> the truncation may be judged by looking at the sum <strong>of</strong> the squares <strong>of</strong> the<br />

coefficients that gaussiantoqmc outputs when it reads the wave function. Unfortunately, this<br />

truncation prevents a full ‘HF test’ (i.e., running the wave function in VMC without a Jastrow<br />

factor and checking that the result agrees with that <strong>of</strong> gaussian), but the energy returned by<br />

such a test should be above that reported by gaussian.<br />

• As well as this truncation to fifty determinants, gaussian has a formatting error which means<br />

that if the index number <strong>of</strong> a determinant is greater than 99,999 then it is replaced by stars and<br />

is thus useless. gaussiantoqmc deals with this by simply throwing away such configurations<br />

which further truncates the expansion.<br />

• gaussian switches to direct mode for large CASSCF calculations and in doing so automatically<br />

stops printing the definitions <strong>of</strong> the Slater determinants used in the calculation. In order to reconstruct<br />

the wave function we do <strong>of</strong> course need to know what the Slater determinants are. gaussian<br />

may be persuaded to print them by using IOp(4/46=3) IOp(4/21=10) IOp(4/21=100).<br />

The first two <strong>of</strong> these both tell gaussian to use Slater determinants (I specified both to be on<br />

the safe side) and the last one in theory tells it to ‘just print the configurations’ although in fact<br />

it still proceeds to do the calculation as well.<br />

• Restarting a CASSCF calculation from a previously converged run fails when symmetry is<br />

switched on. Use ‘Nosymm’ to avoid this problem.<br />

TD-HF and TD-DFT<br />

As far as converting the resulting wave function for use in casino is concerned, these two methods<br />

are no different to CIS apart from the issue <strong>of</strong> normalization. In CIS, the default output is normalized<br />

so that the sum <strong>of</strong> the squares <strong>of</strong> the coefficients is equal to unity. In a TD-HF or TD-DFT calculation<br />

(which involves solving a non-Hermitian eigenvalue problem) a different scheme is used which<br />

essentially means that the sum <strong>of</strong> the squares <strong>of</strong> the coefficients is arbitrary.<br />

It should also be noted that gaussian cannot do gradients within TD-DFT yet and so cannot relax<br />

excited states.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!