14.09.2014 Views

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spectral analysis in the case of a complex potential.<br />

<strong>IPN</strong>O Participation: R.J. Lombard<br />

Collaboration : R. Mezhoud, Faculty of Sciences, Boumerdes University, Boumerdes, Algeria, <strong>and</strong> F.<br />

-Z. Ighezou, Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, USTHB, Bab Ezzouar, Alger, Algeria<br />

Nous avons étendu au cas des potentiels complexes, une méthode développée pour résoudre le problème<br />

inverse pour des potentiels locaux à partir des états liés. Nous présentons un premier exemple entièrement<br />

soluble basé sur le potentiel de Kratzer complexe. Ce modèle permet de tester la méthode et de mettre en<br />

évidence ses limitations. La méthode est appliquée ensuite à deux atomes hadroniques présentant des<br />

caractéristiques très différentes : Π - – 28 Si <strong>and</strong> K - - 208 Pb.<br />

The present work is dealing with the inverse problem<br />

from bound states in the case of a complex<br />

potential. At first glance, this domain is thought as<br />

the natural extension of techniques developed for<br />

real potentials. The method relies on a connection<br />

between the moments of the ground state density<br />

<strong>and</strong> the energies of the yrast levels. It is well suited<br />

for systems with a large (infinite) number of bound<br />

states. Hadronic atoms, for instance, could be a<br />

good field of application.<br />

As the question was studied thoroughly, limitations<br />

appeared. First, the method does not determine<br />

the shape of the imaginary part of the potential,<br />

though it has an influence on the real part of the<br />

eigenvalues <strong>and</strong> on the width. Assuming the imaginary<br />

component to be known, either from scattering<br />

experiment or from a sound model, the present<br />

method could determine the real part of the potential.<br />

It turns out, however, that the effective potential<br />

governing the radial wave function is dependent<br />

on the state through the repulsive contribution<br />

generated by the imaginary part. This could be<br />

redhibitory, since the method developed for the<br />

real case implies local (state independent) potentials.<br />

Taken as an illustrative example, the case of the<br />

complex Kratzer potential shows, however, that<br />

this difficulty can be overcome, taking into account<br />

the shift in energy produced by the state dependence.<br />

This open an opportunity, <strong>and</strong>, in the special<br />

case of the Kratzer potential, it leads to the exact<br />

solution. In other words, in this case the method<br />

we have developed is able to recover the real part<br />

of the potential.<br />

The present work has been completed by the<br />

study of two hadronic atoms : Π - – 28 Si <strong>and</strong><br />

K - - 208 Pb. In the first case use is made of the experimental<br />

data, in the second one, the calcula-<br />

tions of Baca et al have been taken as pseudo<br />

data. Although the conditions are quite different,<br />

the two examples yield similar answers. The<br />

ground state density is well determined outside the<br />

nuclear volume. At short distances, roughly speaking<br />

from the origin to the nuclear surface, the present<br />

method lacks of sensitivity. This is due to the<br />

strong repulsion, which reflects a repulsive nuclear<br />

interaction in the case of pionic atoms, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

strong state dependence in the kaonic case. Consequently,<br />

the real part of the nuclear potential can<br />

only be reached at a qualitative level. For the<br />

kaonic case, the surface shape is obtained, while<br />

the inside part get the wrong sign. Note that only a<br />

tiny fraction of the density is responsible for this<br />

shortcoming.<br />

The fact that with approximative nuclear potentials<br />

the spectra are reproduced to better than 1 \%,<br />

clearly indicates that the eigenvalues are not sensitive<br />

to details of the potential over the nuclear<br />

volume. It means that a model independent determination<br />

of the real part of the nuclear potential is<br />

barely possible.<br />

However, the good determination of the ground<br />

state density, except at short distances, suggests<br />

that the approach could be improved, in order to<br />

get a better description inside the nuclear volume.<br />

This is possible, though not obvious. It would require<br />

to reproduce the eigenvalues of the yrast<br />

levels to better than 0.1 \%. While a great accuracy<br />

is possible with pseudo data resulting from calculations,<br />

such a situation is difficult to reach experimentally.<br />

References:<br />

A. Baca, C. Garcia-Recio <strong>and</strong> J. Nieves, Nucl.<br />

Phys. A 673 (2000) 335.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!