exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A study of new solvable few body problems.<br />
<strong>IPN</strong>O Participation: M. Lassaut, R.J. Lombard<br />
Collaboration : A. Bachkhaznadji, Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Département de Physique,<br />
Université Mentouri, Constantine, Algérie<br />
Nous avons étudié des modèles solubles à petit nombre de nucléons. Nous avons généralisé les problèmes<br />
à 3 corps de Calogero et Calogero-Marchiero-Wolfes en introduisant des potentiels à trois corps non<br />
invariants par translation. Après avoir séparé les variables radiales et angulaires par des transformations<br />
de coordonnées nous avons fourni les solutions propres de l'équation de Schrödinger avec le spectre en<br />
énergie correspondant. Nous avons mis en évidence un domaine de la constante de couplage pour lequel<br />
les solutions irrégulières sont de carré intégrables.<br />
The study of exactly solvable non trivial quantum<br />
systems of few interacting particles still retains attention.<br />
The early works of Calogero [1], Sutherl<strong>and</strong><br />
[2] <strong>and</strong> Wolfes [3] have been followed by the systematic<br />
classification of Olshanetsky <strong>and</strong> Perelomov<br />
[4]. Generalizations <strong>and</strong> new cases have been investigated<br />
in the recent years. In a non exhaustive<br />
way, we quote, for instance, the three-body version<br />
of Sutherl<strong>and</strong> problem, with only a three-body potential,<br />
solved by Quesne [5]. By using supersymmetric<br />
quantum mechanics, Khare <strong>and</strong> co-workers<br />
gave examples of algebraically solvable three-body<br />
problems of Calogero type in D=1 dimensional<br />
space, with additional translationally invariant two<strong>and</strong>/or<br />
three-body potentials[6]. A new integrable<br />
model of the Calogero type, with a non translationally<br />
invariant two-body potential, was worked out in<br />
D=1 by Diaf, Kerris, Lassaut et Lombard [7], <strong>and</strong><br />
extended to D-dimensional space by Bachkhazndji,<br />
Lassaut <strong>and</strong> Lombard [8]. A generalization of the<br />
latter model in D=1 was solved by Meljanac <strong>and</strong> coworkers<br />
[9], by emphasizing the underlying conformal<br />
SU(1,1) symmetry. However, for the three-body<br />
case <strong>and</strong> D=1, these authors give only the energy<br />
spectrum <strong>and</strong> the form of the radial wave function.<br />
The present work investigates again the problem of<br />
Meljanac <strong>and</strong> co-workers for three particles in the<br />
D=1 dimensional space. The model may be viewed<br />
as a generalization of the three-body Calogero problem<br />
with an additional non-translationally invariant<br />
three-body<br />
potential. We recall here that this model belongs to<br />
the class possessing the underlying conformal SU<br />
(1,1) symmetry. It may also be understood as describing<br />
a system of three light interacting particles<br />
of the same mass m in the harmonic field generated<br />
by a fourth infinitely heavy particle.<br />
We provide the full wavefunction in terms of the radial<br />
<strong>and</strong> two angular variables, together with the<br />
corresponding eigenvalues. An emphasis is put on<br />
the irregular solutions stressing the domain of the<br />
coupling constants for which the irregular solutions<br />
are physically acceptable. Finally, we also give the<br />
exact results of two other generalizations of the Calogero-Marchioro-Wolfes<br />
three-body problem.<br />
References:<br />
[1] F. Calogero, J. Math. Phys.10(1969) 2191, J.<br />
Math. Phys.12 (1971) 419.<br />
[2] B. Sutherl<strong>and</strong>, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 246,<br />
Phys. Rev. A 4 (1971) 2019.<br />
[3] J. Wolfes,J. Math. Phys. 15 (1974) 1420.<br />
[4] M.A. Olshanetsky <strong>and</strong> A.M. Perelomov, Phys.<br />
Rep. 71 (1981) 314, Phys. Rep.94 (1983) 6.<br />
[5]C.Quesne, Phys. Rev. A 55 (1997)3931.<br />
[6] A. Khare <strong>and</strong> R.K. Bhaduri, J. Phys A: Math.<br />
Gen. 27 (1994) 2213.<br />
[7] A. Diaf, A.T. Kerris, M. Lassaut <strong>and</strong> R.J.<br />
Lombard, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 7305.<br />
[8] A. Bachkhaznadji, M. Lassaut <strong>and</strong> R.J.<br />
Lombard, J. Phys. A: Math. Theo. 40 (2007) 8791.<br />
[9]S. Meljanac, A. Samsarov, B. Basu-Mallick <strong>and</strong><br />
K.S. Gupta Eur. Phys. J. C 49 (2007) 875.<br />
91