exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
keV -ray with the particles <strong>and</strong> the peak is therefore<br />
ascribed to a transfer to the ground state only.<br />
The two other peaks are know to correspond to<br />
single states. The transferred angular momentum<br />
has been determined for each peak from the comparison<br />
of the extracted angular distribution to distorted<br />
wave Born approximation (DWBA) calculations<br />
performed using the code TWOFNR. Optical<br />
potentials from global formulae were used in the<br />
calculations. Deduced spin <strong>and</strong> parity are in agreement<br />
with previous studies for the GS <strong>and</strong> first excited<br />
state. The negative parity of the state at 3.23<br />
MeV is established for the first time.<br />
References:<br />
[1] C. Détraz et al., Phys. Rev. C 19, 169 (1979).<br />
[2] T. Otsuka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232502<br />
(2005).<br />
[3] W.C. Catford et al., J. Phys. G 31, S1655<br />
(2005).<br />
[4] E.C. Pollacco et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 287<br />
(2005).<br />
[5] B.A. Brown, private communication.<br />
[6] M. Stanoiu et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 034312<br />
(2004).<br />
E(MeV) J E SM J SM<br />
0 (3/2,5/2)+ 0 5/2+<br />
1.408 1/2+ 1.47 1/2+<br />
3.23 (1/2,3/2)- 2.244 1/2-<br />
Table 1 : Comparison of experimental energies<br />
<strong>and</strong> spin/parities assigned from the<br />
DWBA analysis with shell model calculations<br />
Spectroscopic factors (SF) were further deduced<br />
using the st<strong>and</strong>ard procedure of normalization of<br />
the calculated differential cross-section to the data.<br />
Agreement with Shell model calculations is relatively<br />
good taking into account the error on the experimental<br />
SF (25%). The low value of the SF to<br />
the 1/2+ excited state evidences the fact that the<br />
subshell closure at N=14 observed in 22 O [6] is not<br />
yet present in 20 O. In a next step, the comparison<br />
of the present results to existing data on hole<br />
states in 17 O is expected to provide informations on<br />
neutron-neutron components of phenomenological<br />
shell model interactions.<br />
Fig. 2 : Comparison of spectroscopic factors<br />
extracted from the DWBA analysis with shell<br />
model calculations<br />
16