14.09.2014 Views

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

keV -ray with the particles <strong>and</strong> the peak is therefore<br />

ascribed to a transfer to the ground state only.<br />

The two other peaks are know to correspond to<br />

single states. The transferred angular momentum<br />

has been determined for each peak from the comparison<br />

of the extracted angular distribution to distorted<br />

wave Born approximation (DWBA) calculations<br />

performed using the code TWOFNR. Optical<br />

potentials from global formulae were used in the<br />

calculations. Deduced spin <strong>and</strong> parity are in agreement<br />

with previous studies for the GS <strong>and</strong> first excited<br />

state. The negative parity of the state at 3.23<br />

MeV is established for the first time.<br />

References:<br />

[1] C. Détraz et al., Phys. Rev. C 19, 169 (1979).<br />

[2] T. Otsuka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232502<br />

(2005).<br />

[3] W.C. Catford et al., J. Phys. G 31, S1655<br />

(2005).<br />

[4] E.C. Pollacco et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 287<br />

(2005).<br />

[5] B.A. Brown, private communication.<br />

[6] M. Stanoiu et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 034312<br />

(2004).<br />

E(MeV) J E SM J SM<br />

0 (3/2,5/2)+ 0 5/2+<br />

1.408 1/2+ 1.47 1/2+<br />

3.23 (1/2,3/2)- 2.244 1/2-<br />

Table 1 : Comparison of experimental energies<br />

<strong>and</strong> spin/parities assigned from the<br />

DWBA analysis with shell model calculations<br />

Spectroscopic factors (SF) were further deduced<br />

using the st<strong>and</strong>ard procedure of normalization of<br />

the calculated differential cross-section to the data.<br />

Agreement with Shell model calculations is relatively<br />

good taking into account the error on the experimental<br />

SF (25%). The low value of the SF to<br />

the 1/2+ excited state evidences the fact that the<br />

subshell closure at N=14 observed in 22 O [6] is not<br />

yet present in 20 O. In a next step, the comparison<br />

of the present results to existing data on hole<br />

states in 17 O is expected to provide informations on<br />

neutron-neutron components of phenomenological<br />

shell model interactions.<br />

Fig. 2 : Comparison of spectroscopic factors<br />

extracted from the DWBA analysis with shell<br />

model calculations<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!