exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Evaporation-residue residue cross sections: role of the entrance channel<br />
<strong>IPN</strong>O Participation: N. Rowley<br />
Collaboration: Nabila Saffi dine-Grar (Department of Physics, University Ferhat Abbas of Sétif,<br />
19000 Algérie)<br />
Sections efficaces de résidus d’évaporation : rôle de la voie d’entrée<br />
Pour une réaction entre deux ions lourds, la création des résidus d’évaporation est un processus très<br />
complexe, surtout pour les systèmes symétriques où la quasi-fission peut intervenir très fortement. L’étude<br />
d’une gamme de réactions menant au même noyau composé, permet une séparation approximative des<br />
effets de la voie d’entrée (choix du projectile et de la cible) et les effets parvenant des propriétés du noyau<br />
composé lui-même. Nous définissons deux distributions de barrière ; une pour la capture (étape initial da la<br />
réaction) et, en exploitant la section efficace des résidus d’évaporation, une deuxième pour la création du<br />
noyau composé. Une comparaison des deux permet de voir l’importance de la quasi-fission dans les<br />
différents systèmes.<br />
For heavy systems, the formation of high-Z evaporation<br />
residues via heavy-ion capture is a very<br />
complex process. In the early stages of the <strong>reaction</strong>,<br />
the colliding partners encounter an external<br />
Coulomb barrier which they must surmount or penetrate<br />
for the <strong>reaction</strong> to proceed. Once the barrier<br />
has been crossed, the composite system must<br />
evolve to form an equilibrated compound nucleus,<br />
though of course there may be pre-equilibrium fission<br />
before this state is reached; a systemdependent<br />
process referred to as quasifission. Furthermore,<br />
if <strong>and</strong> when a compound nucleus is formed,<br />
it may decay by true fission, as well as becoming<br />
a longer-lived evaporation residue through<br />
the emission of low-mass particles (neutrons, protons,<br />
alpha-particles...). At sufficiently high angular<br />
momentum all of the compound <strong>nuclei</strong> will fission<br />
<strong>and</strong> their contribution to the evaporation residue<br />
cross section will fall to zero.<br />
Even in its first stage, the <strong>reaction</strong> may be further<br />
complicated by the presence of a “distribution of<br />
Coulomb barriers” arising from the internal <strong>structure</strong>s<br />
of the <strong>reaction</strong> partners (principally their highly<br />
collective states). This phenomenon will modify the<br />
coefficents for crossing the external barriers <strong>and</strong><br />
entering into the composite system.<br />
Well above the highest barrier, all of the low partial<br />
waves that are capable of surviving fission will be<br />
fully transmitted, <strong>and</strong>, in the absence of quasifission,<br />
the reduced cross section for evaporationresidue<br />
formation at a given compound-nucleus<br />
excitation energy, becomes independent of the<br />
<strong>reaction</strong> partners [1]. This significantly simplifies<br />
the <strong>reaction</strong> dynamics. However, when attempting<br />
to optimize compound-nucleus formation (for example<br />
in superheavy-element creation) one might<br />
choose a lower energy, where transmission is not<br />
complete but survival is much greater. We investigate<br />
the differences that arise from different<br />
choices of target <strong>and</strong> projectile in this lower-energy<br />
Fig. 1. A comparison of the experimental barrier<br />
distribution ( 96 Zr + 124 Sn <strong>reaction</strong>) for fusion<br />
(compound nucleus creation) with the theoretical<br />
capture distribution shows the dominant role of<br />
quasi-fission for all but the highest barriers. Both<br />
curves are normalized to 1 for comparison, but the<br />
true fusion probability is around 8%.<br />
regime. They essentially come from:<br />
1) the compound nucleus excitation energy at the<br />
corresponding barrier,<br />
2) the “inertial parameter” 2MR 2 which determines<br />
the energy range over which the evaporationresidue<br />
cross section saturates, <strong>and</strong><br />
3) the entrance-channel barrier distribution due to<br />
the intrinsic <strong>structure</strong>s of the reactants.<br />
A good underst<strong>and</strong>ing of these effects will facilitate<br />
the study of the role of quasi-fission which is also<br />
system dependent, being significantly more important<br />
for mass-symmetric systems. It may also possess<br />
a deformation dependence (the survival probability<br />
being greatest for the most “compact” configurations<br />
at contact), <strong>and</strong> may be further influenced<br />
by closed shells in the target <strong>and</strong>/or projectile<br />
(with the fragment-mass drift favouring the<br />
closed-shell <strong>structure</strong>s).<br />
We derive the correct structural form of the evaporation-residue<br />
cross section <strong>and</strong> demonstrate our<br />
70