14.09.2014 Views

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

were taken from ref. [5]. Concerning the 7 Li channel,<br />

we used the optical potential parameters of<br />

Schumacher et al. [6]. The optical potential parameters<br />

finally selected are those giving the best<br />

fit for all the studied transitions in the ( 7 Li,t) <strong>reaction</strong>.<br />

The calculated angular distributions normalized to<br />

the data are shown in Figure 1. For both incident<br />

energies, the calculated curves agree fairly well<br />

with all the measured angular distributions of the<br />

different populated states.<br />

The -spectroscopic factors were extracted from<br />

the normalization of the finite-range DWBA curves<br />

to the experimental data. The spectroscopic factor<br />

for the overlap between +t <strong>and</strong> 7 Li was taken to<br />

We find an 16<br />

44 E2-Sfactor S(0.3 MeV)=50<br />

23<br />

19 keV-b with the best fits shown in<br />

Fig 2. The results are in good agreement with the<br />

results of Brune et al.<br />

Fig 2: Astrophysical S factor (see text)<br />

Fig 1: Angular distributions (see text)<br />

be 1.0 [7].<br />

The good agreement between the DWBA calculations<br />

<strong>and</strong> the measured differential cross sections<br />

of the different excited states of 16 O at the two<br />

bombarding energies of 28 MeV <strong>and</strong> 34 MeV<br />

respectively, gives strong evidence of the direct<br />

nature of the ( 7 Li,t) <strong>reaction</strong> populating these levels<br />

<strong>and</strong> confidence in our DWBA analysis. An S mean<br />

value of 0.15 0.05-0.04 <strong>and</strong> 0.07 0.03 are deduced<br />

for the states of interest at 6.92 MeV <strong>and</strong><br />

7.12 MeV of 16 O respectively. The -reduced width<br />

2<br />

of about 26.7 10.3keV <strong>and</strong> 7.8 2.7 keV for the<br />

6.92 MeV <strong>and</strong> 7.12 states respectively were obtained<br />

at the radius of 6.5 fm. The present value of<br />

2<br />

have been included in R-matrix fits of both 12 C<br />

( , ) 16 O S-factors obtained by direct measurements<br />

at high energies <strong>and</strong> the 12 C( , ) measured<br />

phase shifts [8]. The E1 <strong>and</strong> E2 contributions were<br />

fitted separately. The best fits were determined<br />

through a 2 minimization.<br />

The l=2 fitting ( see Figure 2) was performed using<br />

a 4-level including a background state <strong>and</strong> the astrophysical<br />

S-factors data from [9-11]. The l=1 R-<br />

matrix fitting is still under calculation.<br />

S(300keV)=<br />

keV-b who deduced the<br />

-widths of interest via a sub-coulomb ANC measurement<br />

<strong>and</strong> with those of references [8,10]. However,<br />

it is in disagreement with the value recommended<br />

in NACRE compilation [12].<br />

Conclusion<br />

We determined the reduced -widths of the subthreshold<br />

2 + <strong>and</strong> 1 – states of 16 O from the transfer<br />

<strong>reaction</strong> 12 C( 7 Li,t) 16 O at two incident energies. The<br />

obtained result for the 2 + sub-threshold resonance<br />

was introduced in the R-matrix fitting of radiative<br />

capture <strong>and</strong> elastic-scattering data to determine<br />

the low-energy extrapolations of E2 S-factor. The<br />

result confirms the value obtained in previous<br />

works [4,8,10] <strong>and</strong> disagrees with the value<br />

adopted in NACRE [12] <strong>and</strong> the one deduced in [9]<br />

where the -reduced width of the 6.92 MeV was<br />

considered as a free parameter. Calculations for<br />

the 1 – sub-threshold state are under development.<br />

References<br />

[1] T. A. Weaver <strong>and</strong> S. E. Woosley, Phys. Rep.<br />

227, 65 (1993)<br />

[2] M. Hashimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 94, 663<br />

(1996)<br />

[3] D. Becchetti et al., Nucl. Phys. A 344, 336<br />

(1980)<br />

[4] C. R. Brune et al. Phys. Rev. Lett 83, (1999)<br />

4025 <strong>and</strong> references in<br />

[5] J. D. Garrett et al., Nucl. Phys. A 212, 600<br />

(1973)<br />

[6] P. Schumacher et al., Nucl. Phys. A 212, 573<br />

(1973)<br />

[7] F. D. Becchetti et al., Nucl. Phys. A 305, 293<br />

(1978)<br />

[8] P. Tischauser et al., Phys Rev C 79, 055803<br />

(2009)<br />

[9] M. Assunção et al., Phys Rev C 73, 055801<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!