14.09.2014 Views

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In figure 4 we plot the differential limits <strong>and</strong> the<br />

corresponding integral limits assuming a flux proportional<br />

to E -2 . Also shown is the background contribution<br />

expected to originate from interactions of<br />

CR protons with the CMB. The neutrino background<br />

predicted is smaller if the highest energy<br />

CRs are heavy <strong>nuclei</strong>. shower is directly measured<br />

by the FD elongation rate.<br />

UHECR composition<br />

Fig 3 : Upper limits on the photon fraction in the<br />

integral cosmic-ray flux for different experiments:<br />

AGASA (A1,A2), AGASA-Yakutsk (AY), Yakutsk<br />

(Y), Haverah Park (HP). In black the limits from<br />

Auger surface detector (Auger SD) <strong>and</strong> in blue the<br />

limits above 2, 3, 5, <strong>and</strong> 10 EeV derived through<br />

the hybrid events (Auger HYB). The shaded region<br />

shows the expected GZK photon fraction. Lines<br />

indicate predictions from top-down models<br />

They severely constrain the family of “top-down”<br />

models for CR origin, which predict photon contributions<br />

of up to 50% to the observed CR flux.<br />

At a given energy, the average position of the<br />

depth of shower maximum X max <strong>and</strong> its fluctuations<br />

depend on the composition of the primary CR. The<br />

depth of shower maximum reflects the depth of the<br />

first interaction. Proton showers penetrate deeper<br />

into the atmosphere, have larger values of X max<br />

<strong>and</strong> wider distributions than heavy <strong>nuclei</strong>. Hybrid<br />

events have been used to measure X max [7]. The<br />

information from the SD allows to constrain the<br />

geometry of the EAS. The longitudinal development<br />

of the electromagnetic part of the shower is<br />

directly measured by the FD.<br />

In figure 5 we show the mean value of X max . The<br />

change of < X max > per decade of energy is called<br />

the elongation rate.<br />

Neutrinos<br />

A highly inclined shower initiated by a neutrino<br />

would have a significant electromagnetic component<br />

leading to a broad time <strong>structure</strong> of detected<br />

signals, in contrast to showers induced by protons<br />

or <strong>nuclei</strong> in the upper atmosphere. Earthskimming<br />

tau neutrinos can also lead to showers with similar<br />

properties, induced by emerging tau leptons produced<br />

in the Earth that decay just above the array.<br />

A search has been made for such young inclined<br />

showers <strong>and</strong> no c<strong>and</strong>idates have been found [5,6].<br />

Fig 5 : compared with simulations based on<br />

different hadronic interaction models<br />

Fig 4 : Differential <strong>and</strong> integrated upper limits for a<br />

diffuse flux of down-going all-flavors neutrinos <strong>and</strong><br />

up-going tau neutrinos. Limits from other experiments<br />

are also plotted, as well as backgrounds<br />

expected from the GZK effect..<br />

The data show a larger elongation rate below<br />

10 18.25 eV <strong>and</strong> a smaller elongation rate above. If<br />

the properties of hadronic interactions do not<br />

change significantly over less than two orders of<br />

magnitude in primary energy, this change would<br />

imply a change in composition, becoming heavier<br />

above this energy. In figure 6 we observe a decrease<br />

of the fluctuations of X max with energy. Assuming<br />

again that the hadronic interaction properties<br />

do not change much within the observed energy<br />

range, these decreasing fluctuations could be<br />

explained by an increasing average mass of the<br />

primary particles. The interpretation of these measurements<br />

requires comparison to air shower simu-<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!