14.09.2014 Views

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

exotic nuclei structure and reaction noyaux exotiques ... - IPN - IN2P3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

global electron number of the redox process is increased<br />

because of either the regeneration of the<br />

initial uranyl species (DISP) or the reduction of a<br />

second species formed by the chemical <strong>reaction</strong><br />

(ECE).<br />

Fig. 2: cyclic voltammograms of 0.01 M [UO 2 Cl 4 ] 2-<br />

with x eq. Cl - in [BuMeIm][Tf 2 N] at 25°C at a GC<br />

electrode at 25 mV.s -1 .<br />

Effect of the IL cation: redox behavior of tetrahalouranyl<br />

complex in [MeBu 3 N][Tf 2 N]<br />

Fig. 3 presents the voltammograms of the tetrahalo<br />

uranyl complexes [UO 2 X 4 ] 2- with 10 eq. of halide<br />

ions in both ILs. In [MeBu 3 N][Tf 2 N], the reduction<br />

peaks of [UO 2 Cl 4 ] 2– <strong>and</strong> [UO 2 Br 4 ] 2– are observed<br />

respectively at -1.74 V <strong>and</strong> -1.56 V. In both ILs, the<br />

reduction potential of the bromo complex is higher<br />

than for the chloro analog. This indicates that<br />

[UO 2 Br 4 ] 2– is less stable than [UO 2 Cl 4 ] 2– . We can<br />

also observe for each complex that the reduction<br />

potential is more than 300 mV less negative in<br />

[MeBu 3 N][Tf 2 N] than in [BuMeIm][Tf 2 N]. This can<br />

be account to a difference of solvation as we have<br />

already demonstrated that [BuMeIm] + interacts<br />

more strongly than [MeBu 3 N] + by H-bonding. We<br />

have also shown that the intermediate species<br />

[U V O 2 X 4 ] 3– is less stable in [MeBu 3 N][Tf 2 N] than in<br />

[BuMeIm][Tf 2 N].<br />

0 eq Cl - 5 eq Cl - 10 eq Cl -<br />

0.025 V.s -1 - 0.21 0.52<br />

0.05 V.s -1 - 0.32 0.63<br />

0.1 V.s -1 0.14 0.37 0.71<br />

0.2 V.s -1 0.20 0.42 0.74<br />

0.5 V.s -1 0.27 0.51 0.76<br />

1 V.s -1 0.33 0.54 0.82<br />

2 V.s -1 0.35 0.62 0.84<br />

Table 1: I pa1 /I pc1 measured for [UO 2 Cl 4 ] 2- (0.01M)<br />

with 0, 5 <strong>and</strong> 10 eq of Cl – in [BuMeIm][Tf 2 N] as a<br />

function of the potential scan rate at 25°C.<br />

With a large excess of Cl - , the chemical <strong>reaction</strong> is<br />

no more observed by voltammetry. Our measurements<br />

have shown that in these conditions,<br />

[U VI O 2 Cl 4 ] 2- is reduced via a quasireversible<br />

monoelectronic transfer to form [U V O 2 Cl 4 ] 3- .<br />

Effect of the uranyl lig<strong>and</strong>: electrochemical behavior<br />

of [UO 2 Br 4 ] 2– in [BuMeIm][Tf 2 N]<br />

If the switching cathodic potential is -2.7 V, the cyclic<br />

voltammogram presents a single reduction<br />

peak at -1.24 V <strong>and</strong> two oxidation peaks at -0.3<br />

<strong>and</strong> 0.3 V, this latter corresponding to a redissolution<br />

peak. Then, the reduction of the tetrabromouranyl<br />

complex leads also to the formation of a<br />

deposit at the electrode surface. In the potential<br />

region [-1.6 V ; -0.1 V], when Br - are added to the<br />

solution, a new anodic peak appears around -1.18<br />

V. When the Br - concentration increases, the intensity<br />

of this new peak increases <strong>and</strong> the intensity of<br />

the anodic peaks at higher potentials decreases.<br />

Moreover, at a done Br – concentration, the ratio I pa<br />

(-1.18 V)/I pc (-1.24 V) increases with the potential<br />

scan rate. Nevertheless, for the same halide<br />

amount <strong>and</strong> the same potential scan rate, this ratio<br />

is lower in the case of the bromo complex than for<br />

its chloro analog. This suggests that the intermediate<br />

species [U V O 2 Br 4 ] 3- is less stable than<br />

[U V O 2 Cl 4 ] 3- .<br />

Fig. 3: Voltammograms of 0.01 M [UO 2 Cl 4 ] 2– with<br />

10 eq of Cl - (red curves) <strong>and</strong> 0.01 M [UO 2 Br 4 ] 2–<br />

with 10 eq of Br - in [BuMeIm][Tf 2 N] at 25°C (solid<br />

curves) <strong>and</strong> in [MeBu 3 N][Tf 2 N] at 60°C (dashed<br />

curves) at a GC electrode (0.07 cm 2 ) at 0.1 V.s -1 .<br />

Controlled potential electrolysis<br />

Quantitative electrolysis of the tetrahalouranyl<br />

complexes in both ionic liquids give a deposit at a<br />

platinum cathode. XRD analysis suggests that this<br />

solid phase is composed of amorphous oxide or<br />

hydroxide uranium(IV). Moreover, the voltammetric<br />

analysis of the solution at the end of the electrolysis<br />

indicates that 4 equivalents of halide ions are<br />

produced per eq. of reduced uranyl complex.<br />

Suggested mechanism<br />

The above results allowed us to propose the two<br />

following mechanisms for the reduction of the tetrahalouranyl<br />

complexes in ILs.<br />

DISP mechanism:<br />

[U VI O 2 X 4 ] 2- + e - [U V O 2 X 4 ] 3-<br />

2 [U V O 2 X 4 ] 3- [U IV ] + [U VI O 2 X 4 ] 2- + 4 X -<br />

ECE mechanism:<br />

[U VI O 2 X 4 ] 2- + e - [U V O 2 X 4 ] 3-<br />

[U V O 2 X 4 ] 3- [U V O 2 X (4-x) ] x-3 + x X -<br />

[U V O 2 X (4-x) ] x-3 + e - [U IV ] + (4-x) X -<br />

In both mechanisms, [U IV ] corresponds to oxide or<br />

hydroxide species.<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!