14.09.2014 Views

linked - Institut kurde de Paris

linked - Institut kurde de Paris

linked - Institut kurde de Paris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

n° 261 • December 2006 Information and liaison bulletin • 15 •<br />

READ IN THE TURKISH PRESS:<br />

THE REPORT OF THE OF THE TURKISH FOUNDATION FOR<br />

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (TESEV) REGARDING<br />

THE FORCED DISPLACEMENT OF KURDS<br />

F<br />

ollowing the publication<br />

of a report entitled “The<br />

results of the internal<br />

displacements in Turkey”<br />

by the Turkish<br />

Foundation for Economic and<br />

Social Research (TESEV) the<br />

Turkish daily Milliyet interviewed<br />

Dr. Dilek Kurban, director of the<br />

TESEV programme and Dr. Deniz<br />

Yukseker, lecturer at the University<br />

of Koç, about the forced<br />

displacements carried out in the<br />

90s by the Turkish authorities. The<br />

following are extensive extracts<br />

taken from this interview by the<br />

journalist Derya Sazak:<br />

It is still too early to say that there are<br />

improvements but we know that the<br />

government is becoming aware of the<br />

report and showing a certain interest<br />

in it. Van Province has been chosen as<br />

a pilot region. A plan called “Service<br />

for the displaced population” has been<br />

drawn up in cooperation with the<br />

United Nations Development<br />

Programme and the Van Governorate<br />

was revealed in September, but there<br />

have not yet been any concrete results.<br />

Moreover, in 2004, a compensation<br />

law was passed leading to 200,000<br />

applications from villagers who had<br />

been victims of those forced<br />

displacements. To date, 27,000<br />

applications have succee<strong>de</strong>d but we<br />

have observed that the compensation<br />

given is very small and in no way<br />

realistic (…) The State recognised that<br />

it had displaced 360,000 people. The<br />

Turkish Parliament, in a report<br />

published in 1998, gives a figure of<br />

378,000 people. Civil society<br />

associations, for their part, talk of<br />

between 3 and 4 million people. We, at<br />

TESEV, think that these figures are<br />

not realistic but without having<br />

carried out <strong>de</strong>mographic research<br />

think estimate their number at a<br />

million. According to the Ministry of<br />

the Interior, over 900 villages and<br />

2,000 hamlets were evacuated. A<br />

report drawn up at the request of the<br />

State Planning Office by Hacettepe<br />

University Population Research team,<br />

which has not yet been published,<br />

should enable to un<strong>de</strong>rstand these<br />

statistics more clearly”, points out<br />

Mr. Deniz Yukseker, adding:<br />

“Citizenship must be restored in<br />

Turkey after these forced<br />

displacements, which are illegal even<br />

in periods of armed confrontation. The<br />

Parliamentary report, which goes back<br />

to 1998, expresses the same i<strong>de</strong>a. The<br />

Prefect responsible for the State of<br />

Emergency Region (OHAL)was given<br />

the authority to displace people for<br />

security reasons, but this was carried<br />

out in an illegal manner. It is time to<br />

face up to these forced displacements”.<br />

“The Turkish State has the authority<br />

to displace the population in a legal<br />

context for security reasons. This is<br />

called “evacuation”, and international<br />

law allows this. However, the<br />

situation in the South-East (Editor’s<br />

Note: Turkish Kurdistan) it was<br />

applied illegally. As we have<br />

revealed in our research, this took<br />

place in many places un<strong>de</strong>r<br />

“threats”. The villagers were first<br />

called on to become “village<br />

protectors” (Editor’s Note: State<br />

regional auxiliary militia) — then,<br />

in the event of a refusal, told to<br />

evacuate their village within two<br />

days! If they did not evacuate, the<br />

village was burn to the ground! We<br />

have collected many testimonies in<br />

which the events had many<br />

similarities”, stresses Dr. Yukseker.<br />

Dr. Dilek Kurban, for his part,<br />

pointed out that “the victims at the<br />

beginning of the 90s <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> applied to<br />

the European Court for Human<br />

Rights, which found Turkey guilty<br />

and sentenced it to heavy fines. The<br />

Turkish Republic, recognising that it<br />

was administratively responsible for<br />

the region as a State, accepted to settle<br />

the compensation due to breaches of<br />

rights committed by anyone<br />

whatsoever. But the State has never<br />

accepted that it had evacuated villages<br />

and accused the PKK. 1,500 petitions<br />

have been filed against Turkey and, on<br />

the recommendations of the Council of<br />

Europe, the European Court <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d to<br />

carry out a pilot scheme in collective<br />

cases. Taking into account the<br />

petitions of January 2006, the<br />

European Court reached the following<br />

conclusion: a new internal legal<br />

system regarding compensation must<br />

be applied. In practive, applications<br />

to the European Court are blocked but<br />

the compensation is too small and the<br />

procedure too slow”.<br />

As for the solutions recommen<strong>de</strong>d,<br />

Dr. Kurban pointed out that “we, as<br />

part of TESEV think that the Kurdish<br />

question is a major obstacle in the way<br />

of <strong>de</strong>mocratisation. The source of the<br />

problem is the Kurdish question, thus<br />

the solution is also <strong>linked</strong> with that of<br />

the Kurdish question (…) Turkey has<br />

never accepted the term civil war (…)<br />

If this was accepted it would be<br />

possible to evacuate civilians for their<br />

own security, on condition that this<br />

was only temporary. The victims of of<br />

displacements were, to a large extent<br />

those who refused to assume the role of<br />

“village protectors”. It can thus be<br />

seen as a punishment. Moreover, the<br />

armed clashes have ceased since 1999<br />

but these people have still not been<br />

able to return to their villages. Thus it<br />

is not temporary and, even so,<br />

humanitarian aid from the United<br />

Nations was refused until 2002<br />

(Editor’s Note: or from the Red<br />

Crescent) for this population. Even if<br />

at least 355,000 people have been<br />

displaced, this is a great catastrophe<br />

and the State should <strong>de</strong>ploy as much

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!