Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada
Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada
Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Appendix C—The Value of Human Consequences using Discounted Future Earnings<br />
E = the Ontario probability of employment given participation, from<br />
Labour Force Historical Review, 2005, Statistics <strong>Canada</strong><br />
71F0004XCB.<br />
Y = the average Ontario earnings if employed, from Statistics <strong>Canada</strong><br />
(CANSIM).<br />
The data on labour force participation and probability of employment<br />
were available by sex in five-year groups for five-year age groups<br />
from 15-19 to 65-69 and for 70 and over. We further subdivided the<br />
last group by five-year increments by prorating the pattern Miller<br />
reported in 1993. Similarly, earnings data were available for only<br />
certain age groupings (15-19, 20-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and<br />
65 and over). Again, we prorated the observed statistics over the<br />
required five-year age groups using the earnings pattern reported by<br />
Miller.<br />
• Annual household production was calculated as the product of average<br />
employment income per person in Ontario and the ratio of Annual Household<br />
Production to Annual Earnings in Miller’s data from 1993, in each five-year<br />
age group. The validity of this calculation requires an assumption that this<br />
ratio has not changed since then.<br />
• Survival probabilities (of being alive a year later given one is alive at a<br />
particular year of age), from Life Tables, <strong>Canada</strong> Provinces and Territories,<br />
1995-1997, Statistics <strong>Canada</strong> 84-537-XIE.<br />
• Fringe benefits were assumed, as was the case in Miller’s work, to equal<br />
34.1% of wages based on data from Employee Benefit Cost in <strong>Canada</strong>, 1991,<br />
KPMG Peat Marwick Stevenson & Kellogg.<br />
E. SUMMARY OF DFE LOSSES<br />
The exhibit shows losses as discounted future earnings at a real discount rate of<br />
4%, the rate chosen by Miller et al. (Ted Miller, Brooke Whiting, Brenda Kragh, and<br />
Charles Zegeer, “Sensitivity of Resource Allocation Models to Discount Rate and<br />
Unreported Accidents,” Transportation Research Record 1124, pp. 58-65, 1987). Totals<br />
are based on unadjusted data from ORSAR as we do not know the characteristics needed<br />
for the DFE calculations of the adjusted injury and fatality data. More significant are the<br />
average costs which are used in the social cost model. Other discount rates can be easily<br />
applied using the spreadsheet.<br />
TNS Canadian Facts, Social and Policy Research 171