13.09.2014 Views

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix C—The Value of Human Consequences using Discounted Future Earnings<br />

E = the Ontario probability of employment given participation, from<br />

Labour Force Historical Review, 2005, Statistics <strong>Canada</strong><br />

71F0004XCB.<br />

Y = the average Ontario earnings if employed, from Statistics <strong>Canada</strong><br />

(CANSIM).<br />

The data on labour force participation and probability of employment<br />

were available by sex in five-year groups for five-year age groups<br />

from 15-19 to 65-69 and for 70 and over. We further subdivided the<br />

last group by five-year increments by prorating the pattern Miller<br />

reported in 1993. Similarly, earnings data were available for only<br />

certain age groupings (15-19, 20-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and<br />

65 and over). Again, we prorated the observed statistics over the<br />

required five-year age groups using the earnings pattern reported by<br />

Miller.<br />

• Annual household production was calculated as the product of average<br />

employment income per person in Ontario and the ratio of Annual Household<br />

Production to Annual Earnings in Miller’s data from 1993, in each five-year<br />

age group. The validity of this calculation requires an assumption that this<br />

ratio has not changed since then.<br />

• Survival probabilities (of being alive a year later given one is alive at a<br />

particular year of age), from Life Tables, <strong>Canada</strong> Provinces and Territories,<br />

1995-1997, Statistics <strong>Canada</strong> 84-537-XIE.<br />

• Fringe benefits were assumed, as was the case in Miller’s work, to equal<br />

34.1% of wages based on data from Employee Benefit Cost in <strong>Canada</strong>, 1991,<br />

KPMG Peat Marwick Stevenson & Kellogg.<br />

E. SUMMARY OF DFE LOSSES<br />

The exhibit shows losses as discounted future earnings at a real discount rate of<br />

4%, the rate chosen by Miller et al. (Ted Miller, Brooke Whiting, Brenda Kragh, and<br />

Charles Zegeer, “Sensitivity of Resource Allocation Models to Discount Rate and<br />

Unreported Accidents,” Transportation Research Record 1124, pp. 58-65, 1987). Totals<br />

are based on unadjusted data from ORSAR as we do not know the characteristics needed<br />

for the DFE calculations of the adjusted injury and fatality data. More significant are the<br />

average costs which are used in the social cost model. Other discount rates can be easily<br />

applied using the spreadsheet.<br />

TNS Canadian Facts, Social and Policy Research 171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!