Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada
Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada
Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPENDIX C: THE VALUE OF HUMAN CONSEQUENCES USING<br />
DISCOUNTED FUTURE EARNINGS<br />
For the most part, the methods used here follow those applied by Ted Miller and<br />
described in Appendix D of the 1994 final report. Where more recent or improved data<br />
were available, the methods exploited them. Where previous results seemed questionable,<br />
the calculations were revised to bring the results into line with reasonable expectations.<br />
Some parts of the description that follows have been taken from the Appendix D referred<br />
to above. The application of the methods described here occurs in a spreadsheet file<br />
called “Discounted Future Earnings.xls”.<br />
A. DISCOUNTED FUTURE EARNINGS AND LOST HOUSEHOLD<br />
PRODUCTION<br />
Losses are measured for foregone future earnings in three main types of case:<br />
fatalities, permanent disabilities (total and partial), and temporary disabilities and injuries.<br />
Fatalities cost people future earnings in the form of their expected wages, fringe<br />
benefits, and household production for the lifespan that a life table suggests lay before<br />
them in the absence of their fatal collision. Permanent total disabilities have the same<br />
effect (although average losses differ because the age and sex distributions for fatal and<br />
nonfatal injuries differ). Permanent partial disabilities are assumed to cost an average of<br />
17% of lifetime earnings (Monroe Berkowitz and John Burton Jr., Permanent Disability<br />
Benefits in Workers’ Compensation, Kalamazoo MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for<br />
Employment Research, 1987).<br />
Probabilities of permanent disability are applied to the numbers of major, minor,<br />
and minimal injuries. These probabilities were taken from U.S. data (Ted Miller, Nancy<br />
Pindus, John <strong>Douglas</strong>s, and Shelli Rossman, Nonfatal Injury Incidence, Costs, and<br />
Consequences: A Data Book, The Urban Institute Press, published in early 1994), as<br />
follows:<br />
Total Partial<br />
Hospitalized .0162 .1493<br />
Other Med Treated .0006 .0115<br />
MTO defines hospitalized injuries as major injuries. Other medically treated<br />
injuries closely resemble MTO’s minor-injury category. Injuries not treated at hospital<br />
are MTO minimal injuries. We assign one-half the probability of total and partial<br />
permanent disability of other medically treated injuries to this group. Our assumption is<br />
that some injuries, including neck and back injuries, may not be immediately apparent.<br />
TNS Canadian Facts, Social and Policy Research 167