13.09.2014 Views

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX C: THE VALUE OF HUMAN CONSEQUENCES USING<br />

DISCOUNTED FUTURE EARNINGS<br />

For the most part, the methods used here follow those applied by Ted Miller and<br />

described in Appendix D of the 1994 final report. Where more recent or improved data<br />

were available, the methods exploited them. Where previous results seemed questionable,<br />

the calculations were revised to bring the results into line with reasonable expectations.<br />

Some parts of the description that follows have been taken from the Appendix D referred<br />

to above. The application of the methods described here occurs in a spreadsheet file<br />

called “Discounted Future Earnings.xls”.<br />

A. DISCOUNTED FUTURE EARNINGS AND LOST HOUSEHOLD<br />

PRODUCTION<br />

Losses are measured for foregone future earnings in three main types of case:<br />

fatalities, permanent disabilities (total and partial), and temporary disabilities and injuries.<br />

Fatalities cost people future earnings in the form of their expected wages, fringe<br />

benefits, and household production for the lifespan that a life table suggests lay before<br />

them in the absence of their fatal collision. Permanent total disabilities have the same<br />

effect (although average losses differ because the age and sex distributions for fatal and<br />

nonfatal injuries differ). Permanent partial disabilities are assumed to cost an average of<br />

17% of lifetime earnings (Monroe Berkowitz and John Burton Jr., Permanent Disability<br />

Benefits in Workers’ Compensation, Kalamazoo MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for<br />

Employment Research, 1987).<br />

Probabilities of permanent disability are applied to the numbers of major, minor,<br />

and minimal injuries. These probabilities were taken from U.S. data (Ted Miller, Nancy<br />

Pindus, John <strong>Douglas</strong>s, and Shelli Rossman, Nonfatal Injury Incidence, Costs, and<br />

Consequences: A Data Book, The Urban Institute Press, published in early 1994), as<br />

follows:<br />

Total Partial<br />

Hospitalized .0162 .1493<br />

Other Med Treated .0006 .0115<br />

MTO defines hospitalized injuries as major injuries. Other medically treated<br />

injuries closely resemble MTO’s minor-injury category. Injuries not treated at hospital<br />

are MTO minimal injuries. We assign one-half the probability of total and partial<br />

permanent disability of other medically treated injuries to this group. Our assumption is<br />

that some injuries, including neck and back injuries, may not be immediately apparent.<br />

TNS Canadian Facts, Social and Policy Research 167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!