13.09.2014 Views

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Analysis and Estimation of the Social Cost of Motor Vehicle Collisions in Ontario<br />

adjustments made in the raw data to better reflect the impacts on those involved in the<br />

collisions.<br />

a) Additional deaths reported by Coroner’s Office<br />

ORSAR lists 799 fatalities related to motor vehicle collisions in Ontario in 2004.<br />

These data are based on Motor Vehicle Accident Reports (MVAR) filed by police<br />

officers. On occasion, a MVAR may not be submitted by police or may be amended but<br />

too late for inclusion in the ORSAR. Also the cause of death may be determined only<br />

later to be a motor vehicle collision by the Coroner but this information may not be<br />

provided to ORSAR or may be provided too late to include in ORSAR.<br />

For 2004, the Coroner reports approximately 900 fatalities due to transportation<br />

related crashes, including HTA-reportable and non-reportable collisions, train and<br />

subway related incidents using a one-year cut-off instead of the 30-day limit imposed by<br />

ORSAR. Of the extra 36 motor vehicle collision fatalities reported by the Coroner, 21<br />

occurred within 30 days and of them 14, could be determined to be HTA reportable based<br />

on the weight of evidence. (The status of one case could not be determined.)<br />

As a result, 813 fatalities, or 1.02 times the number identified in ORSAR, are used<br />

in the model for 2004. The same factor will be used for subsequent years to reflect<br />

fatalities not reported to ORSAR. A later section discusses how these extra fatalities are<br />

allocated in the model.<br />

b) Additional injuries reported by hospitals and in a re-analysis of Chipman<br />

Data in ORSAR on the number of injuries and their severity are derived from<br />

police reports filled out at the scene of the collision or shortly after the collision.<br />

Attending police officers will have information on those who are transported directly to<br />

hospital (major and minor injuries) and may have information although potentially not<br />

complete on those admitted to hospital (major injuries). They will have information on<br />

others who report injuries not requiring transport to hospital (minimal injuries) at the<br />

collision scene. Police will follow-up with hospitals to find out the extent of injuries and<br />

will amend reports as necessary. However, police will not have information and reports<br />

will not record those individuals who subsequently develop symptoms of injury. These<br />

injuries may include minimal injuries, requiring no or limited medical intervention, minor<br />

injuries, requiring an emergency room visit, or major injuries, involving hospital stays.<br />

Since police reports are the basis of ORSAR data, which in turn form the raw data used in<br />

our model, these counts of injuries are unlikely to reflect the full extent of injuries<br />

resulting from motor vehicle collisions.<br />

To account for under-reporting of injuries we rely on two sources of information.<br />

The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOH&LTC) captures use of medical<br />

facilities such as emergency room visits and the characteristics of hospital stays (hospital<br />

separations and duration) against codes identifying the reason for the injury. A number of<br />

116 TNS Canadian Facts, Social and Policy Research

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!