The California Surveyor - CLSA
The California Surveyor - CLSA
The California Surveyor - CLSA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(CONTINUED FROM PACE 25)<br />
For example, I can cite many past<br />
listed 30 easements. If I estimated<br />
my fee for a map that needed to<br />
show easements, I would either need<br />
a copy of the title report to know<br />
what I am dealing with, or lacking<br />
the report, assume that there were<br />
no more than two easements. One<br />
or two days of work can be underestimated<br />
very easily, just in easements.<br />
Most fees are given out<br />
without ever knowing how many<br />
easements there are.<br />
We had a project last year that<br />
included our assumptions in the<br />
Exhibit portion of the contract. <strong>The</strong><br />
site was located in a familiar area<br />
where I had worked ten years earlier.<br />
<strong>The</strong> client had paid the required<br />
50% deposit, the job was prepared<br />
and the field crew had been sent to<br />
the site. I received a call from the<br />
party chief advising me there were<br />
no centerline points or ties anywhere<br />
within two blocks of the site. I<br />
advised the crew to return to the<br />
office. I called the client and explained<br />
the "failed assumption" of<br />
no control and an extra day of field<br />
and half day of office time would be<br />
required under an "extra work order"<br />
to continue the project. <strong>The</strong><br />
client chose not to continue the<br />
project, but we were paid for our<br />
work to date and able to refund him<br />
any funds left over from the deposit.<br />
In explaining the assumption that,<br />
"75% of the controlling monuments<br />
will be in" or "the number of easements<br />
in the title report will be limited"<br />
has failed, we eliminate the<br />
problem of explaining why the job<br />
cannot be completed for the fee<br />
stated in the contract. Some of you<br />
may feel using assumptions is unfair.<br />
<strong>The</strong> majority of our clients<br />
response to this method has been<br />
good. It allows good communication<br />
with our clients before budgets<br />
are blown and tempers have flared.<br />
Be creative using assumptions in<br />
your next contract. With good<br />
projects in which the title report communication,<br />
everyone wins!<br />
Lloyd ]. Cook is the Director of the Survey<br />
Department of C.W. Cook Co., Inc., a Land<br />
Surveying, Civil Engineering and Land<br />
Entitlements firm serving the City of<br />
Los Angeles since 1911. •<br />
Figure 2<br />
<strong>The</strong> Following Assumptions Have Failed<br />
JOB#<br />
DATE<br />
SITE<br />
BY<br />
REASON<br />
TIME Used Estimated<br />
#<br />
REASON<br />
TIME<br />
[1 Used MEstimated<br />
#<br />
REASON<br />
TIME<br />
[ ] Used []Estimated<br />
Field Notes Attached: [ ] Yes [ ] No<br />
DISPOSITION<br />
PROJECT HELD<br />
Obtain authorization for $<br />
deposit of $<br />
PROJECT CONTINUING<br />
Obtain authorization for $<br />
deposit of $<br />
NOTIFY CLIENT: Extra charges of $<br />
will be added to invoice<br />
PROJECT COMPLETE<br />
Include explanation for extra charges of $<br />
.with invoice<br />
[ ] Hold Plans [ ] Release Plans<br />
26 <strong>The</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>Surveyor</strong> Fall 1992