The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
75<br />
(60) dan hifxid et rut<br />
Dan frightened Acc Ruth<br />
(61) dan iyem al rut<br />
Dan threatened on Ruth<br />
<strong>The</strong> internal role assigned to rut by hifxid in (60) is easy to identify as [-c+m]<br />
(Experiencer). It has the feature /-c since rut is not causing the ‘fright’, but rather feels<br />
it, and it has the feature /+m since rut’s mental state is clearly relevant.<br />
Let us turn now to iyem (‘threatened’). <strong>The</strong> internal role assigned by iyem is<br />
surely specified as /-c since the argument bearing this role is not causing the ‘threat’.<br />
Crucially, however, whether a mental state should be associated with the relevant<br />
argument or not (/+m or /-m, respectively) is undetermined.<br />
Consider first the contrast in (62):<br />
(62) a. *ha-macav ha-kalkali hifxid et atid ha-medina<br />
the-situation the-economic frightened Acc future the-country<br />
b. ha-macav ha-kalkali iyem al atid ha-medina<br />
the-situation the-economic threatened on future the-country<br />
“<strong>The</strong> economic situation threatened the future of the country.”<br />
That the Experiencer theta-role cannot be realized by a DP projected from a nonhuman<br />
N is intuitively clear. This intuition is stated explicitly in the <strong>The</strong>ta System:<br />
/+m feature entails [+human] (or [+animate]). This accounts for the ungrammaticality<br />
of (62a). <strong>The</strong> grammaticality of (62b) supports the assumption that the internal thetarole<br />
assigned by iyem (‘threatened’) is [-c] rather than [-c+m]. <strong>The</strong> lack of /+m<br />
specification in the internal cluster of iyem (‘threatened’) allows a non-human DP atid<br />
ha-medina (‘future of the country’) to realize this role.<br />
A [-c] role (Goal), although consistent with the Experiencer interpretation, does<br />
not have to be interpreted as such. It can be interpreted simply as Goal. Thus in (61)<br />
the argument realizing [-c], namely rut, is consistent with Experiencer interpretation if<br />
we perceive rut as being emotionally affected by the threats. However, rut can be<br />
equally viewed as just the recipient of the threats, the goal of threatening. In contrast,<br />
the argument realizing the fully specified [-c+m] role (Experiencer) in (60) can be