12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

75<br />

(60) dan hifxid et rut<br />

Dan frightened Acc Ruth<br />

(61) dan iyem al rut<br />

Dan threatened on Ruth<br />

<strong>The</strong> internal role assigned to rut by hifxid in (60) is easy to identify as [-c+m]<br />

(Experiencer). It has the feature /-c since rut is not causing the ‘fright’, but rather feels<br />

it, and it has the feature /+m since rut’s mental state is clearly relevant.<br />

Let us turn now to iyem (‘threatened’). <strong>The</strong> internal role assigned by iyem is<br />

surely specified as /-c since the argument bearing this role is not causing the ‘threat’.<br />

Crucially, however, whether a mental state should be associated with the relevant<br />

argument or not (/+m or /-m, respectively) is undetermined.<br />

Consider first the contrast in (62):<br />

(62) a. *ha-macav ha-kalkali hifxid et atid ha-medina<br />

the-situation the-economic frightened Acc future the-country<br />

b. ha-macav ha-kalkali iyem al atid ha-medina<br />

the-situation the-economic threatened on future the-country<br />

“<strong>The</strong> economic situation threatened the future of the country.”<br />

That the Experiencer theta-role cannot be realized by a DP projected from a nonhuman<br />

N is intuitively clear. This intuition is stated explicitly in the <strong>The</strong>ta System:<br />

/+m feature entails [+human] (or [+animate]). This accounts for the ungrammaticality<br />

of (62a). <strong>The</strong> grammaticality of (62b) supports the assumption that the internal thetarole<br />

assigned by iyem (‘threatened’) is [-c] rather than [-c+m]. <strong>The</strong> lack of /+m<br />

specification in the internal cluster of iyem (‘threatened’) allows a non-human DP atid<br />

ha-medina (‘future of the country’) to realize this role.<br />

A [-c] role (Goal), although consistent with the Experiencer interpretation, does<br />

not have to be interpreted as such. It can be interpreted simply as Goal. Thus in (61)<br />

the argument realizing [-c], namely rut, is consistent with Experiencer interpretation if<br />

we perceive rut as being emotionally affected by the threats. However, rut can be<br />

equally viewed as just the recipient of the threats, the goal of threatening. In contrast,<br />

the argument realizing the fully specified [-c+m] role (Experiencer) in (60) can be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!