The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(46). 28 Summarizing the above, P C is a Case-checking device motivated by the<br />
66<br />
<strong>The</strong> ungrammaticality of (49a) indicates that the P DP sequence is indeed a PP<br />
in Hebrew as well as in Dutch, supporting further the analysis of this sequence in<br />
(thematic) properties of the verb. A verb with an underspecified internal theta-cluster<br />
does not carry the [Acc], and therefore it selects in the lexicon a semantically<br />
appropriate small P (see ahead), which checks the Case of the nominal. To make this<br />
concrete, in what follows I illustrate the lexical marking and derivation of a PP-verb.<br />
<strong>The</strong> notation used in the illustration is given in (50):<br />
(50) [Case] = the uninterpretable Case-feature of a nominal<br />
[-φ] = uninterpretable φ-features<br />
(For completeness, I specify the EPP feature on T)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Lexicon marking of a regular transitive verb and of a PP-verb is<br />
schematicized in (51) and (52). It is followed by a concrete example of the Hebrew<br />
PP-verb ma’amin (‘believes’) in (53).<br />
Lexicon marking:<br />
(51) V: θ θ θ 1 θ 2 [Acc]<br />
[+m+c] [-c-m] [+m+c] [-c-m]<br />
28 Once the presence of a PP in PP-verb constructions has been established, the following should be<br />
mentioned. It has been noted that PPs seem to be transparent for c-command within (cf. Pesetsky<br />
1995) (i). More specifically, the pronoun embedded in the PPs is assumed to c-command the R-<br />
expression in the adjunct, inducing Condition C violation (Chomsky 1981, but see Reinhart 1983).<br />
Note that unlike (ia), the preposition in (ib) specifies the locative relation, and therefore it is not P C but<br />
rather P R (the relevant example is due to Idan Landau p.c.):<br />
(i) a. *samaxti ale-ha i ad ha-ne’um šel rina i<br />
[I] relied on-her until the-speech of Rina<br />
b. *dan amad meaxor-av i ad ha-ne’um šel yosi i<br />
Dan stood behind-him until the-speech of Yosi<br />
Even though the described phenomenon does not seem to follow automatically from the theory of P<br />
developed in the study, it is consistent with the uniform classification of P, argued for here. At this<br />
stage I can only speculate that the phenomenon should be attributed to the functional classification of<br />
P. Further research is necessary in order to establish this speculation. (For a radically different account<br />
of the phenomenon see Pesetsky 1995).