12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(46). 28 Summarizing the above, P C is a Case-checking device motivated by the<br />

66<br />

<strong>The</strong> ungrammaticality of (49a) indicates that the P DP sequence is indeed a PP<br />

in Hebrew as well as in Dutch, supporting further the analysis of this sequence in<br />

(thematic) properties of the verb. A verb with an underspecified internal theta-cluster<br />

does not carry the [Acc], and therefore it selects in the lexicon a semantically<br />

appropriate small P (see ahead), which checks the Case of the nominal. To make this<br />

concrete, in what follows I illustrate the lexical marking and derivation of a PP-verb.<br />

<strong>The</strong> notation used in the illustration is given in (50):<br />

(50) [Case] = the uninterpretable Case-feature of a nominal<br />

[-φ] = uninterpretable φ-features<br />

(For completeness, I specify the EPP feature on T)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Lexicon marking of a regular transitive verb and of a PP-verb is<br />

schematicized in (51) and (52). It is followed by a concrete example of the Hebrew<br />

PP-verb ma’amin (‘believes’) in (53).<br />

Lexicon marking:<br />

(51) V: θ θ θ 1 θ 2 [Acc]<br />

[+m+c] [-c-m] [+m+c] [-c-m]<br />

28 Once the presence of a PP in PP-verb constructions has been established, the following should be<br />

mentioned. It has been noted that PPs seem to be transparent for c-command within (cf. Pesetsky<br />

1995) (i). More specifically, the pronoun embedded in the PPs is assumed to c-command the R-<br />

expression in the adjunct, inducing Condition C violation (Chomsky 1981, but see Reinhart 1983).<br />

Note that unlike (ia), the preposition in (ib) specifies the locative relation, and therefore it is not P C but<br />

rather P R (the relevant example is due to Idan Landau p.c.):<br />

(i) a. *samaxti ale-ha i ad ha-ne’um šel rina i<br />

[I] relied on-her until the-speech of Rina<br />

b. *dan amad meaxor-av i ad ha-ne’um šel yosi i<br />

Dan stood behind-him until the-speech of Yosi<br />

Even though the described phenomenon does not seem to follow automatically from the theory of P<br />

developed in the study, it is consistent with the uniform classification of P, argued for here. At this<br />

stage I can only speculate that the phenomenon should be attributed to the functional classification of<br />

P. Further research is necessary in order to establish this speculation. (For a radically different account<br />

of the phenomenon see Pesetsky 1995).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!