12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58<br />

(25) a. on našol konfet-u v karman-e<br />

he found candy-Acc in pocket-Loc<br />

“He found the/a candy in the pocket.”<br />

b. on našol konfet-u na stol-e<br />

he found candy-Acc on table-Loc<br />

“He found the/a candy on the table.”<br />

(26) a. on verit v Sach-u/etu teori-yu<br />

he believes in Sacha-Acc/this theory-Acc<br />

“He believes in Sacha/this theory.”<br />

b. on pologayets y a na Sach-u/evo intu’ici-yu<br />

he relies on Sacha-Acc/his intuition-Acc<br />

“He relies on Sacha/his intuition.”<br />

On the plausible assumption that Locative Case is indeed inherent, licensed by the<br />

locative relation, its appearance in (25) is expected. <strong>The</strong> fact that Locative is not<br />

assigned in PP-verb constructions (26) is accounted for, given the claim that their P is<br />

not P R , but rather P C , which does not denote a (locative) relation, but just checks the<br />

Case feature of the nominal. 24<br />

(ii) As observed in Van Riemsdijk (1998) and mentioned in chapter 2, locative<br />

Ps (in locative contexts) exhibit the so-called bottom-up dependency. More<br />

specifically, the choice of a particular locative P is sometimes determined by its<br />

nominal complement. Thus a picture may seem to be hanging in the air, when<br />

actually it is hanging on the wall. <strong>The</strong> bottom-up dependency, illustrated for Hebrew<br />

in (27), is absent when the same prepositions occur with PP-verbs (28):<br />

(27) a. dan sam/maca et ha-sefer al/*be-šulxan<br />

Dan put/found Acc the-book on/in-table<br />

24 Despite the identical morphological manifestation, namely Accusative, the (structural) Case checking<br />

by V [Acc] and by P C are not intended here to be identical procedures. <strong>The</strong> checking of the Case feature<br />

of the nominal by P C is a purely formal procedure divorced from any thematic/semantic relation. This is<br />

of course not true with respect to checking of Accusative by V [Acc] . <strong>The</strong> ability to check Accusative is<br />

tightly connected to the theta-structure of a verb. Thus, although Accusative (and Nominative) is<br />

widely assumed to be structural, it is certainly not dissociated from the thematic structure of the verb<br />

(see Reinhart and Siloni 2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!