12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

55<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore I delay the answer to this question until section 3.4, and proceed with the<br />

first one.<br />

3.2.4 Why a PP?<br />

Actually, the answer to the question why the underspecified clusters are realized<br />

as a PP (rather than a DP) follows from (23c) (repeated below for convenience) and<br />

few standard assumptions.<br />

(23) c. If the entry includes both a [+] cluster and a fully specified cluster<br />

[/α, /-c], mark the verb with the [Acc] feature.<br />

Based on (23c), and given the hypothesis that the internal argument of PP-verbs<br />

is not fully specified (19), these verb are not marked with the [Acc] feature.<br />

[Acc] in the <strong>The</strong>ta System corresponds to the ability of a verb to check the<br />

(uninterpretable) Case feature of a DP. Thus (23c) (i.e. [Acc] marking) is consistent<br />

with the more familiar implementation of Case-checking assumed in the Minimalist<br />

framework (cf. Chomsky 1995, 2001). More specifically, being marked with [Acc] is<br />

parallel to having a full set of uninterpretable φ-features, carried by the verbal<br />

functional head v (v* in Chomsky 2001). 18 Note that the class of verbs marked with<br />

[Acc] in Reinhart (2000) coincides with the class of verbs whose lexical projection is<br />

assumed to merge with v (the locus of the uninterpretable φ-features) in the<br />

Minimalist framework, the so-called transitive verbs (e.g. kill, kiss, love). 19<br />

Given this, let me summarize the relevant assumptions (i)-(iv) and their<br />

consequence (v):<br />

(i) <strong>The</strong> Case feature of a nominal is uninterpretable, and therefore has to be deleted<br />

(Chomsky 1995, 2000, 2001).<br />

(ii) [Acc] is the ability of a verb to check the Case feature of a DP, therefore only<br />

verbal entries which are lexically marked with [Acc] can check the Case of a DP (the<br />

above discussion).<br />

18 For a more elaborated view of [Acc] see Reinhart and Siloni 2003.<br />

19 <strong>The</strong> notion ‘transitive’ in the present context should be taken in its narrow syntactic sense. It refers to<br />

two-place verbs whose internal argument is realized as a DP, distinguishing between verbs such as kill,<br />

love, on the one hand, and rely (on), believe (in), on the other hand. In its broader (semantic) use, the<br />

term ‘transitive’ refers to two-place verbs with an external argument and an internal one, whether direct<br />

(DP) or indirect (PP).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!