The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
55<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore I delay the answer to this question until section 3.4, and proceed with the<br />
first one.<br />
3.2.4 Why a PP?<br />
Actually, the answer to the question why the underspecified clusters are realized<br />
as a PP (rather than a DP) follows from (23c) (repeated below for convenience) and<br />
few standard assumptions.<br />
(23) c. If the entry includes both a [+] cluster and a fully specified cluster<br />
[/α, /-c], mark the verb with the [Acc] feature.<br />
Based on (23c), and given the hypothesis that the internal argument of PP-verbs<br />
is not fully specified (19), these verb are not marked with the [Acc] feature.<br />
[Acc] in the <strong>The</strong>ta System corresponds to the ability of a verb to check the<br />
(uninterpretable) Case feature of a DP. Thus (23c) (i.e. [Acc] marking) is consistent<br />
with the more familiar implementation of Case-checking assumed in the Minimalist<br />
framework (cf. Chomsky 1995, 2001). More specifically, being marked with [Acc] is<br />
parallel to having a full set of uninterpretable φ-features, carried by the verbal<br />
functional head v (v* in Chomsky 2001). 18 Note that the class of verbs marked with<br />
[Acc] in Reinhart (2000) coincides with the class of verbs whose lexical projection is<br />
assumed to merge with v (the locus of the uninterpretable φ-features) in the<br />
Minimalist framework, the so-called transitive verbs (e.g. kill, kiss, love). 19<br />
Given this, let me summarize the relevant assumptions (i)-(iv) and their<br />
consequence (v):<br />
(i) <strong>The</strong> Case feature of a nominal is uninterpretable, and therefore has to be deleted<br />
(Chomsky 1995, 2000, 2001).<br />
(ii) [Acc] is the ability of a verb to check the Case feature of a DP, therefore only<br />
verbal entries which are lexically marked with [Acc] can check the Case of a DP (the<br />
above discussion).<br />
18 For a more elaborated view of [Acc] see Reinhart and Siloni 2003.<br />
19 <strong>The</strong> notion ‘transitive’ in the present context should be taken in its narrow syntactic sense. It refers to<br />
two-place verbs whose internal argument is realized as a DP, distinguishing between verbs such as kill,<br />
love, on the one hand, and rely (on), believe (in), on the other hand. In its broader (semantic) use, the<br />
term ‘transitive’ refers to two-place verbs with an external argument and an internal one, whether direct<br />
(DP) or indirect (PP).