The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
47<br />
(7) Verbs of (dis)belief: he’emin be- (‘believe in’), batax be- (‘trusted’), samax al<br />
(‘relied on’), nitla be- (‘depended on’), xašad be- (‘suspected’), pikpek be-<br />
(‘doubted’/’questioned’), ‘kine be-/le-’ (‘envied’, was ‘jealous of’).<br />
(8) Verbs of looking: hibit/histakel be- (‘looked/glanced at’), hivxin be- (‘noticed’),<br />
hitbonen be- (‘inspected’, ‘observed’), cafa be- (‘watched’), baha be- (‘glared at’).<br />
(9) Verbs of physical contact: xavat be- (‘hit’), ba’at be- (‘kicked’), naga be-<br />
(‘touched’), halam/hika be- (‘beat’).<br />
(10) Verbs of abstract contact: tamax be- (‘supported’), nazaf be- (‘scolded’), hifcir<br />
be- (‘pleaded with’), tipel be- (‘dealt with’), he’ic be- (‘urged’), xibel be-<br />
(‘sabotaged’), alav be- (‘hurt’), paga be- (‘hit’, ‘hurt’, ‘damaged’), bagad be-<br />
(‘betrayed’), šita be- ([made] ‘fool of’), hišpi’a al (‘influenced’), iyem al<br />
(‘threatened’), pakad al (‘ordered’), asar al (‘forbid’).<br />
(11) Geographic relation verbs: gaval be- ([had] ‘border with’), xalaš/šalat al (was<br />
located above), hiškif al (‘overlooked’, in its geographical sense).<br />
(12) De-animal verbs: zinev be- (literally: cut the ‘tail’, meaning: made less, cut the<br />
edge), ximer be- (speed up an animal).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a significant group of PP-verbs in the hitpa’el verbal template<br />
(exemplified in (13)). <strong>The</strong> relevant characteristic of this template (on a par with<br />
templates such as nif’al and the pure passive pu’al and huf’al) is its inability to assign<br />
or check Accusative. Thus, for the hitpa’el group of PP-verbs, it would be reasonable<br />
to claim that the function of P is to assign or check Case. This fact, by itself, does not<br />
have any far-reaching implications for the phenomenon of PP-verbs, since the fact<br />
remains that the vast majority of PP-verbs in Hebrew are not in hitpa’el (or in any<br />
non-Accusative template, for that matter). Despite the fact that my main effort will<br />
not be directed towards this group, its existence will turn out to be helpful in<br />
clarifying certain issues.