The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
This work was carried out under the supervision of Professor Julia Horvath Doctor Tal Siloni
Acknowledgements It has been a long, difficult, but most importantly, exciting and challenging journey. Despite occasional despair, temporary hair loss, constant longing for (fiction) books and films, I enjoyed every moment of it. Not only because I am completely and totally in love with linguistics, that too (thank you, Noam Chomsky), but mainly because I had the most wonderful companions. Appropriately expressing my gratitude towards Julia Horvath and Tal Siloni, my supervisors, is virtually impossible. They were always there for me, linguistically and otherwise. Julia Horvath’s profound apprehension of the linguistic theory was the basis of our many fruitful, inspiring and challenging discussions, while her immeasurable patience, generosity and understanding of the human nature saved me more then once from indulging in self-pity. Tal Siloni’s endless scientific enthusiasm and exquisite scientific taste, clarity of mind and depth of thought were like a lighthouse in a storm; with her unique kindness and compassion for human weaknesses, she saved my sanity. To have these two great women and linguists as my guides in the thick forest of prepositions has been sheer pleasure and enormous privilege. I am greatly indebted to Martin Everaert, Idan Landau, and Tanya Reinhart. I thank Martin Everaert for providing me with the stimulating and supporting environment of the OTS-Utrecht Institute of Linguistics at the (almost) final stage of my journey, and for his willingness to plunge into my ocean (more than once) and come up with the most valuable comments, delicious food for thought, and topics for further research – all these in the most attentive, gentle and humorous way (as if he did not have other significant and time consuming things on his mind and desk at the same time). I am very grateful to Idan Landau, a dear friend and brilliant colleague, who was always willing to listen, read and comment insightfully and constructively, from the very beginning till the end. Tanya Reinhart’s work and personality are a constant source of inspiration to me. I thank her for reminding me that thinking is one’s primary duty and privilege, for
- Page 1: Tel-Aviv University The Lester & Sa
- Page 5 and 6: Abstract 1. Introduction (chapter 1
- Page 7 and 8: c. *Dan i talked about him i d. *Da
- Page 9 and 10: (9) The main hypothesis P is unifor
- Page 11 and 12: In the Theta System theta-roles are
- Page 13 and 14: The (semantically limited) distribu
- Page 15 and 16: of the main verb, along lines propo
- Page 17 and 18: 3.2.2 The theta-features (Reinhart
- Page 19 and 20: 5.4.2.1 The status and function of
- Page 21 and 22: 2 1.1 Previous approaches to P 1.1.
- Page 23 and 24: 4 (5) a. dan higi’a axarey ha-mes
- Page 25 and 26: 6 b. misaviv *(le)-ec Hebrew around
- Page 27 and 28: 8 These approaches do depart from t
- Page 29 and 30: 10 heads such as N, V, A do not. 10
- Page 31 and 32: 12 To summarize, as it stands, Grim
- Page 33 and 34: 14 by the corresponding lexical hea
- Page 35 and 36: 16 In the Object Purpose Clause con
- Page 37 and 38: 18 2. The theory of P The main goal
- Page 39 and 40: 20 yes/no questions).This is comple
- Page 41 and 42: 22 (2) Criterion Functional categor
- Page 43 and 44: 24 In various languages some Ps are
- Page 45 and 46: 26 sharp contrast to the core lexic
- Page 47 and 48: 28 lexical, of course) (see the dis
- Page 49 and 50: 30 (iv) Froud 2001 is a psycholingu
- Page 51 and 52: 32 perspective, I will assume that
Acknowledgements<br />
It has been a long, difficult, but most importantly, exciting and challenging<br />
journey. Despite occasional despair, temporary hair loss, constant longing for (fiction)<br />
books and films, I enjoyed every moment of it. Not only because I am completely and<br />
totally in love with linguistics, that too (thank you, Noam Chomsky), but mainly<br />
because I had the most wonderful companions.<br />
Appropriately expressing my gratitude towards Julia Horvath and Tal Siloni, my<br />
supervisors, is virtually impossible. <strong>The</strong>y were always there for me, linguistically and<br />
otherwise.<br />
Julia Horvath’s profound apprehension of the linguistic theory was the basis of<br />
our many fruitful, inspiring and challenging discussions, while her immeasurable<br />
patience, generosity and understanding of the human nature saved me more then once<br />
from indulging in self-pity.<br />
Tal Siloni’s endless scientific enthusiasm and exquisite scientific taste, clarity of<br />
mind and depth of thought were like a lighthouse in a storm; with her unique kindness<br />
and compassion for human weaknesses, she saved my sanity.<br />
To have these two great women and linguists as my guides in the thick forest of<br />
prepositions has been sheer pleasure and enormous privilege.<br />
I am greatly indebted to Martin Everaert, Idan Landau, and Tanya Reinhart.<br />
I thank Martin Everaert for providing me with the stimulating and supporting<br />
environment of the OTS-Utrecht Institute of Linguistics at the (almost) final stage of<br />
my journey, and for his willingness to plunge into my ocean (more than once) and<br />
come up with the most valuable comments, delicious food for thought, and topics for<br />
further research – all these in the most attentive, gentle and humorous way (as if he<br />
did not have other significant and time consuming things on his mind and desk at the<br />
same time).<br />
I am very grateful to Idan Landau, a dear friend and brilliant colleague, who was<br />
always willing to listen, read and comment insightfully and constructively, from the<br />
very beginning till the end.<br />
Tanya Reinhart’s work and personality are a constant source of inspiration to<br />
me. I thank her for reminding me that thinking is one’s primary duty and privilege, for