The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
236<br />
Froud, K. 2001. “Prepositions and the Lexical/Functional Divide: Aphasic evidence”,<br />
Lingua 111, 1-28.<br />
Fukui, N. 1986. A <strong>The</strong>ory of <strong>Category</strong> Projection and its application. Ph.D.<br />
dissertation, MIT.<br />
Fukui, N. and M. Speas, 1986. “Specifiers and <strong>Projections</strong>”, MIT Working Papers in<br />
Linguistics 8, 128-172.<br />
Giorgi, A. 1991. “Prepositions, Binding and <strong>The</strong>ta-marking”, Long-Distance<br />
Anaphora, J. Koster and E. Reuland (eds.), Cambridge University Press.<br />
Goldshlach, N. and E. Hershman, 2001. “Middle be’ivrit pe’aley emca haderech”,<br />
ms., Tel Aviv University.<br />
Greenberg, Y. 1994. Hebrew Nominal Sentences and the Nature of the Stage-<br />
Individual Level Distinction. M.A. thesis, Bar-Ilan Univrsity.<br />
Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge Mass., MIT Press.<br />
Grimshaw, J. 1991. “Extended <strong>Projections</strong>”, ms., Brandeis University, NY.<br />
Grodzinsky, Y. 1988. “Syntactic Representations in Agrammatic Aphasia: <strong>The</strong> Case<br />
of Prepositions”, Language and Speech 31, Part 2, 115-134.<br />
Grosu, A. 1994. Three Studies in Locality and Case. London, Routledge.<br />
Grosu, A. and J. Horvath, 1987. “On Non-Finiteness in Extraction Constructions”,<br />
Natural Language and Linguistic <strong>The</strong>ory 5, 181-196.<br />
Gruber, J. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.<br />
Gulligan, G. 1988. “Arbitrary Agreement”, CLS 24 Part 2.<br />
Haegeman, L. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding <strong>The</strong>ory. Blackwell.<br />
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser, 1992. “<strong>The</strong> Syntactic Character of <strong>The</strong>matic Structure”,<br />
<strong>The</strong>matic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, M. Roca (ed.), Berlin: Foris.<br />
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser, 1994. “On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression<br />
of Syntactic Relations”, <strong>The</strong> View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain<br />
Bromberger, K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.), Cambridge Mass., MIT Press.<br />
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser, 1996. “On the Double Object Construction”, ms. MIT.<br />
Hale, K. and P. Platero, 1986. “Parts of Speech”, <strong>Features</strong> and <strong>Projections</strong>, P.<br />
Muysken and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Studies in Generative Grammar, Foris<br />
Publications.<br />
Hazout, I. 1990. Verbal Nouns: <strong>The</strong>ta-theoretic Studies in Hebrew and Arabic. Ph.D.<br />
dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.<br />
Hazout, I. 1994. “<strong>The</strong> Hebrew Pronoun ze and the Syntax of Sentential Subjects”,<br />
Lingua 93, 265-282.<br />
Hazout, I. 1995. “Infinitives and <strong>The</strong>matic Structure”, ms., Haifa University.<br />
Hestvik, A. 1991. “Subjectless Binding Domains.” Natural Language and Linguistic<br />
<strong>The</strong>ory 9, 455-497.<br />
Higginbotham, J. 1985. “On Semantics”, Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547-593.<br />
Hinrichs, E. W. 1985. A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference<br />
in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.<br />
Hoekstra, T. 1984. Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government-Binding<br />
<strong>The</strong>ory. Dordrecht: Foris.<br />
Hoekstra, T. and R. Mulder, 1990. “Unergatives as Copular Verbs; Locational and<br />
Existential Predication”, <strong>The</strong> Linguistic Review 7, 1-79.<br />
Hornstein, N. and A. Weinberg, 1981. “Case <strong>The</strong>ory and Preposition Stranding”,<br />
Linguistic Inquiry 12.1, 54-91.