The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
235<br />
Danon, G. 2002. Case and Formal Definitness: <strong>The</strong> Licensing of Definite Noun<br />
Phrases in Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.<br />
Davidson, D. 1967. “<strong>The</strong> Logical Form of Action Sentences”, <strong>The</strong> Logic of Decision<br />
and Action, N. Rescher (ed.), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 81-95.<br />
Déchaine, R.-M. 1993. Predicates across Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, University of<br />
Massachusetts, Amherst.<br />
Den Dikken, M. 1995. Particles. On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic, and<br />
Causative Constructions. Oxford University Press.<br />
Di Sciullo, A. M., and E. Williams, 1986. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge<br />
Mass., MIT Press.<br />
Dimitriadis, A. 1999. “On Clitics, Prepositions and Case Licensing in Standard and<br />
Macedonian Greek”, Studies in Greek Syntax, A. Alexiadou et. al. (eds.), Kluwer<br />
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.<br />
Doron, E. 1983. Verbless Predicates in Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, University of<br />
Texas, Austin.<br />
Doron, E. 2003. “Agency and Voice: <strong>The</strong> Semantics of the Semitic Templates”,<br />
Natural Language Semantics, 11, 1-67.<br />
Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht.<br />
Dowty, D. 1989. “On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘<strong>The</strong>matic Role’”,<br />
Properties Types and Meaning, Volume II: Semantic Issues, G. Chierchia, B. H.<br />
Partee and R. Turner (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.<br />
Dowty, D. 1991. “<strong>The</strong>matic Proto-roles and Argument Selection”, Language 67, 547-<br />
619.<br />
Emonds, J. 1985. A Unified <strong>The</strong>ory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.<br />
Engelhardt, M. 1998. <strong>The</strong> Syntax of Nominalized Properties. Ph.D. dissertation, <strong>The</strong><br />
Hebrew University, Jerusalem.<br />
Epstein, S. D. 1989. “Quantification in Null Operator Constructions”, Linguistic<br />
Inquiry 20, 535-571.<br />
Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport, in preparation. <strong>The</strong> Atoms of Meaning:<br />
Interpreting Verb <strong>Projections</strong>. Ben Gurion University.<br />
Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport, “Bare Aspect: A <strong>The</strong>ory of Syntactic Projection”,<br />
to appear in <strong>The</strong> Syntax of Tense, J. Gueron and J. Lecarme (eds.), Cambridge<br />
Mass., MIT Press.<br />
Everaert, M. 2002. “<strong>The</strong> Case of the <strong>The</strong>ta System”, <strong>The</strong>oretical Linguistics 28.3,<br />
325-339.<br />
Faraci, R. A. 1974. Aspects of the Grammar of Infinitives and for-phrases. Ph. D.<br />
Dissertation, MIT.<br />
Fiengo, R. and H. Lasnik, 1974. “Complement Object Deletion”, Linguistic Inquiry 4,<br />
535-571.<br />
Fillmore, C. 1968. “<strong>The</strong> Case for Case”, Universals in Linguistic <strong>The</strong>ory, E. Bach,<br />
and R. T. Harms (eds.), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.<br />
Franks, S. and G. R. Greenberg, 1988. “Agreement, Tense and the Case of Subjects in<br />
Russian”, CLS 24, Part 2.<br />
Friederici, A. 1982. “Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Aphasic Deficits: <strong>The</strong><br />
Availability of Prepositions”, Brain and Language 15, 249-258.<br />
Fries, N. 1991. “Prepositions and Prepositional Phrases: a Contrastive Analysis”,<br />
Approaches to Prepositions, G. Rauh (ed.), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.