12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

232<br />

.<br />

‘found’) does not license le- in its SC complement, whereas nehefax (‘turned’) does.<br />

On the assumption that nimca ([is/was] ‘found’), unlike nehefax (‘turned’), does not<br />

denote path, the noted contrast follows:<br />

(B.8)<br />

a. dan nehefax (le)-ašem<br />

Dan turned to-guilty<br />

“Dan turned guilty.”<br />

b. dan nimca (*le)-ašem<br />

Dan found to-guilty<br />

Intended meaning: “Dan was found guilty.”<br />

To summarize, in the familiar Directional context, where the path is spatial, the<br />

internal argument of the Directional P such as le- (‘to’) is Location, realized as a DP<br />

or a PP. <strong>The</strong> path denoted by the presently discussed verbs is not spatial, it is<br />

transition from one state to another. Consequently, it does not end up in a Location,<br />

but rather in a property, realized as an NP or an AP.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!