12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

229<br />

.<br />

Based on (A.2), the object gap PP/NP is an adjunct to A’ (or AP) in the TC, but<br />

to the DegP in the DegC. In the former it has to contain a gap, as this gap (i.e. the<br />

internal theta-role of the embedded predicate) is the external argument of the complex<br />

AP to be assigned to the subject. In contrast, in DegC the semantic role assigned to<br />

the subject exists independently of the adjoined PP/NP. <strong>The</strong>refore it does not have to<br />

contain a gap, but it may.<br />

Appendix B: <strong>The</strong> P-morpheme le- in ECM/Raising Small Clauses<br />

In addition to the object gap constructions discussed in this chapter, the P-<br />

morpheme le- (‘to’) is also used to introduce nominal and adjectival SC predicates<br />

selected by a small variety of ECM/Raising verbs (B.1):<br />

(B.1) dan i hafax/nexšav [ t i le-miflecet/yafe] 71<br />

Dan turned/considered to-monster/beautiful<br />

“Dan turned into /is considered a monster/ beautiful.”<br />

That the complement of le- in these constructions is indeed predicative is shown<br />

in (B.2), using the pronominal reference diagnostic (see 5.1):<br />

(B.2) a. Dan hafax le-miflecet i . *hi i alva be-kulam.<br />

Dan turned to-monster-fem. She offended in-everyone.<br />

b. Dan i hafax le-miflecet. hu i alav be-kulam.<br />

Dan turned to-monster-fem. He offended in-everyone.<br />

“Dan turned into a monster. He offended everyone.”<br />

71 nexšav (‘is considered’), the passive form of maxšiv (‘considered’), is clearly an ECM verb, as can be<br />

seen from the examples in (i). <strong>The</strong> totally different interpretations indicate that the DP following the<br />

verb in (ia) is not the argument of the verb (Rothstein 2001):<br />

(i) a. dan maxšiv [oto le-šakran]<br />

Dan considers him to-liar<br />

“Dan considers him a liar.”<br />

b. dan maxšiv oto<br />

Dan considers him<br />

“Dan highly considers him.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!