12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

227<br />

Appendix A: <strong>The</strong> Degree Construction (DegC)<br />

.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Degree construction (DegC) with degree phrases like miday (‘too’) seems<br />

similar to the TC. <strong>The</strong> embedded constituent (verbal in English, nominal in Hebrew)<br />

is dependent on the occurrence of the degree phrase (1a), similarly to the embedded<br />

constituent in the TC, which is dependent on the occurrence of the tough A (A.1b): 68<br />

(A.1) a. ha-madafim *(miday) kcarim le-harkava e DegC<br />

<strong>The</strong> shelves [are] too short to install<br />

b. ha-madafim *kcarim/kalim le-harkava e TC<br />

<strong>The</strong> shelves [are] short/easy to install<br />

However, the DegC and the TC are different in some respects, all of which are<br />

probably connected to the relation between the adjective and the DP-subject in each<br />

of the discussed constructions (i.e. John and angry in (A.1a) and John and easy in<br />

(A.1b)). 69<br />

As already discussed at length, the tough A does not have an external argument<br />

on its own, although it has, as any other A, an external slot, and therefore can act as a<br />

predicate (of an expletive subject). I have argued that in the TC the embedded adjunct<br />

( le NP in Hebrew, PP in English) forms a complex predicate with the tough A,<br />

providing the tough A with the external argument. Thus it is only upon complex<br />

predicate formation that the subject position in the TC is thematic.<br />

68 <strong>The</strong> clauses which appear with degree phrases like miday (‘too’) are sometimes referred to as ‘result<br />

clauses’. However, Browning (1987) notes that a more appropriate term would be ‘negative result<br />

clauses’. <strong>The</strong> property predicated of John in (i) is that he is angry to such a degree that it is impossible<br />

to talk to him:<br />

(i)<br />

John is too angry to talk to.<br />

69 Some additional differences between the DegC and TC include the following: <strong>The</strong> constituent which<br />

contains the gap ( le NP in Hebrew, PP in English) is not obligatory (ia); it can be clausal (in Hebrew),<br />

and does not necessarily contain a gap (ib):<br />

(i)<br />

a. ha-madafim kcarim miday (le-harkava)<br />

the-shelves short too (to-installation)<br />

“<strong>The</strong> shelves are too short (to install).”<br />

b. ha-ši’ur meša’amem mixdey še-dan iša’er er<br />

the-class [is] boring too that-Dan will stay awake<br />

“<strong>The</strong> class is too boring for Dan to stay awake.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!