12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

226<br />

.<br />

(111) dan [ VP hevi et ha-oto] [ leNP le-tikun]<br />

Dan [ VP brought the car] [ PP to repair]<br />

(111) says that ‘<strong>The</strong> purpose of the event of bringing the car is that the car be<br />

repaired’. Thus it seems reasonable to suggest that (111) is interpreted as a complex<br />

event (by the PART-OF relation). More specifically, in (111) the PART-OF relation<br />

relates the pur(e 1 ) (purpose of e 1 ) and the event argument of the secondary predicate<br />

( le NP/PP) (112):<br />

(112) λe. ∃e 1 ∃e 2 [e= ↑(e 1 Ue 2 ) ∧ PART-OF (pur(e 1 ),(e 2 )]<br />

I propose further that object-orientedness of the le NP/PP in the OPC can be<br />

derived, based on the distinction observed in Faraci (1974:78) between intentional<br />

PCs and functional PCs. Faraci notes that the notion ‘purpose’ is ambiguous. It can be<br />

interpreted either as the intention of a participant (the participant’s purpose in doing<br />

something, as in Dan arrived to read his new poems), or it can be interpreted as the<br />

function of a participant (the purpose of a participant in some event, as in <strong>The</strong> chair is<br />

there to sit on). <strong>The</strong> OPC has the function interpretation, i.e. the OPC is not about the<br />

intention of a participant, but rather about the purpose of some action regarding a<br />

participant. A thematic role associated with a participant which undergoes some<br />

action is <strong>The</strong>me (realized as the direct object). Given this and the constraint that a<br />

secondary predicate has to share an argument with the matrix one, object-orientedness<br />

of the le NP/PP in the OPC follows.<br />

Thus, we can summarize the proposal in section 5.5 as follows. In the OPC the<br />

predicative constituent ( le NP/PP) is a secondary predicate, adjoined to some<br />

projection of the matrix V. It is interpreted as part of a complex event, where its e<br />

argument defines the purpose of the event denoted by the verb. <strong>The</strong> external slot of<br />

the le NP/PP is discharged by the internal argument of the matrix verb.<br />

In the TC the le NP/PP is an obligatory adjunct. Its e variable is modified by the<br />

internal semantic argument of the tough A, resulting in a complex AP predicate with<br />

an external argument slot. <strong>The</strong> latter is discharged by the subject of the TC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!