The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
211<br />
e. ha-dira kaša le-icuv TC<br />
the-apartment difficult to-designing<br />
“<strong>The</strong> apartment is difficult to design.”<br />
.<br />
Given (73), however, the question whether a tough A has an external argument<br />
reemerges. <strong>The</strong> tough A is semantically predicated internally in (73a) but externally in<br />
(73c). Note, that once the TC is taken into consideration, the picture becomes even<br />
more complicated. In the TC (73e), the tough A seems to be predicated (externally) of<br />
an individual, rather than of event.<br />
In what follows, I will adopt the view familiar from Chomsky 1986, Browning<br />
1987, Cinque 1990, among others, and assume that the semantic argument of the<br />
tough As is internal, rather than external. 52 Note that following Rothstein (2001),<br />
tough-headed APs are nevertheless inherent predicates, namely they do have an open<br />
external slot which has to be closed by predication. With this in mind, let us return to<br />
the TC.<br />
5.5.1.2 <strong>The</strong> subject position: Chomsky (1981) notes that as opposed to a nonthematic<br />
subject position, which can host idiom-chunks or expletive subjects (74), the<br />
subject position of the TC resists them (75). That is, if the discussed position is, in<br />
fact, a theta-position, the ungrammaticality of (75) is expected, as it involves<br />
movement of an idiom chunk into a thematic position, which is excluded (but see<br />
Boškovič 1994): 53<br />
(74) a. Good care seems [ t to be taken t of the orphans]<br />
b. <strong>The</strong>re is believed [t to have been a crime committed t].<br />
(75) a. *Good care is hard [to take t of the orphans]<br />
52 <strong>The</strong>re are alternative views: <strong>The</strong> ability to predicate either externally or internally is argued in<br />
Hazout (1994) to be the typical property of these As in Hebrew. Kim (1996) argues for a uniform<br />
external predication, accounting for sentences like (73a) by extraposition of a sentential argument to a<br />
sentence-final position (but see Rothstein 2001 for arguments against such view). Note that neither the<br />
alternative views nor the familiar one can account in a straightforward way for the non-uniform<br />
behavior of the tough A (i.e. the grammatical (73c) as opposed to the ungrammatical (73d), but the<br />
grammatical (73e)).<br />
53 <strong>The</strong> thematic status of the subject position led Chomsky (1981) to propose a reanalysis of the<br />
adjective-complement as a complex adjective. This solution is abandoned in Chomsky (1986) in favor<br />
of the Op-movement analysis.