12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

209<br />

(70) a. ha-sefer kal/kaše [ leNP li-kri’a ]<br />

the-book easy/difficult to-reading<br />

b. <strong>The</strong> book is easy/difficult [ PP Op to [ VP read t ]]<br />

.<br />

One of the well-known controversies associated with this construction is the<br />

thematic status of its subject position: Is it a thematic position or a non-thematic<br />

one? 48 In what follows I will address this issue focusing on the properties of the tough<br />

A in general, and on its function in the TC.<br />

5.5.1.1 <strong>The</strong> tough A: <strong>The</strong> non-thematic status of the subject position in the TC<br />

is primarily motivated by the existence of the expletive subject construction (71a),<br />

which is taken to indicate that the tough adjective does not have an external argument<br />

(71b). However, by itself, this cannot be considered as conclusive evidence, as there<br />

are predicates, Object Experiencer verbs and adjectives (e.g. worry, annoy), which<br />

also occur in expletive subject construction (72a), but nevertheless, do have an<br />

external argument (72b) (Pesetsky 1987, 1995, Reinhart 2001):<br />

(71) a. It is easy to clean this carpet.<br />

b. *<strong>The</strong> carpet is easy.<br />

(72) a. It is annoying that Sacha is late.<br />

b. Your cat is annoying.<br />

Note that the ungrammaticality of (71b) may have a different explanation. For<br />

instance, a sentence like His behavior is blue is infelicitous. However, we do not<br />

automatically conclude that blue does not have an external argument, but rather that<br />

blue is incompatible with an argument such as his behavior.<br />

Ordinary APs are modifiers of (nominal) arguments and inherent predicates<br />

(Rothstein 2001). As predicates, APs are assumed to have an open position that has to<br />

48 <strong>The</strong> thematic status of the subject position was crucial in the previously assumed framework (GB,<br />

Chomsky 1981), where lexical insertion, regulated by the Projection Principle and the <strong>The</strong>ta-Criterion,<br />

was assumed to result in a syntactic level of representation referred to as the D-Structure. In the<br />

Minimalist framework (Chomsky 1993, 1995) the mentioned controversy is less significant, as no such<br />

level is assumed to exist. Nevertheless, the nature of this position is still an intriguing issue.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!