12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

1.1 Previous approaches to P<br />

1.1.1 <strong>The</strong> lexical approach<br />

As already mentioned, since Jackendoff (1973, 1977) P is no longer ignored.<br />

Motivated by the variety of complements taken by Ps (1) and corroborated by the<br />

availability of P-specific adverbials analyzed as the specifiers of PPs (2), P is argued<br />

to be a lexical head, similarly to N, V, A, which projects a phrasal category of its<br />

own, namely a PP, according to the X-bar schema.<br />

(1) a. dan higi’a axarey [ DP ha-mesiba]<br />

“Dan arrived after the party.”<br />

b. dan higi’a axarey [ CP še ha-ša’on cilcel]<br />

Dan arrived after that the-clock rang<br />

“Dan arrived after the clock rang.”<br />

c. ha-kadur hitgalgel el [ PP mitaxat la-mita]<br />

the-ball rolled to under to+the-bed<br />

“<strong>The</strong> ball rolled under the bed.”<br />

(2) Lisa (*right/straight) found the candy (right/straight) in her pocket.<br />

<strong>The</strong> categorial features [±V, ±N], proposed originally in Chomsky (1970) for the<br />

three major lexical categories N, V, and A, were extended later (Chomsky 1981) to<br />

define members of the category P as [-V -N], establishing the theoretical status of P as<br />

the fourth lexical category (in what follows I will refer to this approach as ‘the lexical<br />

approach to P’). 2 <strong>The</strong> categorial specification assumed for P (especially the feature<br />

[-N] which P shares with V) was believed to capture cross-categorial generalizations<br />

such as the ability to assign Case, typical of Ps and Vs. One of the significant<br />

consequences of the classification of P as lexical is that it takes prepositions to be<br />

predicates, namely potential theta-assigners.<br />

2 Jackendoff (1977: 31-32) proposes a somewhat different breakdown into binary specified features,<br />

namely [±subject, ±object]. In his classification P is [-subject +object]. Additional approaches to<br />

feature specification are found in Stowell (1981), Muysken and Van Riemsdijk (1986), Reuland<br />

(1986), Abney (1987), Dechaine (1993), Zwarts (1997). (See Baker (2003) for a critical discussion of<br />

these feature systems, including the standard one mentioned in the main text).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!