12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178<br />

.<br />

specifier of an NP is the position of the external, Agent argument of an e-nominal<br />

such as ha-harisa šel ha-cava et ha-ir (‘the army’s destruction of the city’), as shown<br />

in (10). Spec-NP, therefore, is clearly not appropriate to host an operator. 8<br />

(10) NP<br />

DP N’<br />

the army’s N DP<br />

destruction<br />

the city<br />

If the discussed le-nominal sequence is a PP, then an additional position is<br />

available, the specifier of the PP:<br />

(11) PP<br />

Op P’<br />

P<br />

le-<br />

NP<br />

N’<br />

N<br />

t<br />

Even if the specifier of the PP headed by le- is an A’-position, (11) is<br />

problematic, as the Op moves out of the nominal. A’-movement out of nominals in<br />

Hebrew is not attested, as shown in (12): 9<br />

8 If the nominal was a DP, then in addition to spec-NP, there was a spec-DP position which could, in<br />

principle, host an Op. Indeed, Op-movement into a specifier of a (modifier) DP is proposed in Siloni<br />

(1994, 1997) for semi-relatives.<br />

9 Note that in the analysis of Hebrew semi-relatives in Siloni (1994, 1997), Op moves into spec-DP, i.e.<br />

the movement is within the nominal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!