The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
139<br />
Directional P form a complex predicate. As a result, the <strong>The</strong>me (of the original verbal<br />
predicate) and the Location of the Directional P become co-arguments. <strong>The</strong> former is<br />
the external argument of the complex Directional predicate (V-P dir ), and the latter is its<br />
internal one. Under “Reflexivity”, this means that the complex V-P dir is an independent<br />
(syntactic) predicate, defining the lower VP (boldface) as the Binding domain, as shown<br />
in (52):<br />
(52) LF representation<br />
…[ VP DP Ag V [ VP DP Th [ V’ [ V’ V path [ PP P dir DP Loc ]]]]]<br />
V-P dir : Arg (θ <strong>The</strong>me ), Int (location)<br />
It is worth noting that the above account makes a non-trivial assumption that the<br />
lower V and the upper one are, to some extent, separate predicates. Consider (53):<br />
(53) ba-xalom, bart šalax et acmo i /*oto i le-pariz<br />
“In his dream, Bart sent himself/him to Paris.”<br />
(53) shows that the Agent argument of the verb and its <strong>The</strong>me argument are coarguments.<br />
I have argued that the Location argument and the <strong>The</strong>me arguments are coarguments<br />
as well. However, based on (42), the Location argument (realized as a<br />
pronoun) and the Agent argument are clearly not co-arguments.<br />
Note that separation of predicates in the Directional construction cannot be<br />
derived directly from the VP-shell analysis itself. In the Dative construction, assumed to<br />
be materialized in the VP-shell, all the arguments (Agent, <strong>The</strong>me and Goal) are indeed<br />
co-arguments (see 4.2), indicating that the lower and the upper Vs are a single predicate.<br />
As far as the Directional construction is concerned, note first that it is not<br />
surprising that the Agent and the <strong>The</strong>me are co-arguments (53); they are the original<br />
arguments of the verb. Further, the Location argument introduced by the Directional<br />
predicate (P) forms a complex predicate with the lower V. As a result, <strong>The</strong>me and<br />
Location become co-arguments (51). However, the verb and the Directional P remain<br />
separate domains of predication, despite the process of complex predicate formation.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore the Agent argument of the verb and the Location argument of the Directional<br />
predicate are not co-arguments (42).