12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the main verb, along lines proposed by Rothstein (2000, 2003) for resultative<br />

constructions (e.g. Dan wiped the table clean). In the Tough Construction, the NP/PP<br />

and the tough adjective are argued to form a complex AP predicate. <strong>The</strong> complex<br />

tough predicate, unlike the tough adjective itself, has an external argument slot (the<br />

externalized theta-role of the N/V). Viewed this way, the analysis of the Tough<br />

Construction explains and settles the long-standing controversy associated with the<br />

thematic status of the subject position in the Tough Construction (cf. Chomsky 1981,<br />

1986).<br />

<strong>The</strong> outcome of the analysis is that the cluster of properties attested in object gap<br />

constructions in English vs. Hebrew follows from the ‘Lex/Syn (Lexicon/Syntax)<br />

parameter’ (Reinhart and Siloni 2003). More specifically, in Hebrew externalization<br />

of the theta-role by P pred takes place in the lexicon, in English the same happens in<br />

syntax. This immediately explains why in English, but not in Hebrew, externalization<br />

involves Op (null operator)-movement. Furthermore, it provides a promising direction<br />

for deriving the fact, previously unaccounted for, that the constructions are nominal in<br />

Hebrew but verbal in English.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!