12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102<br />

(A.6) a. mabat-o nadad<br />

(motion)<br />

glance-his wandered<br />

“His glance wandered.”<br />

b. hu taka bi mabat niz’am (change of location)<br />

he stuck in+me glance furious<br />

“He stuck in me a furious glance.”<br />

c. hu he’if le-evr-i mabat niz’am (direction)<br />

he threw to-side-mine glance furious<br />

“He threw in my direction a furious glance.”<br />

Recall that the structure proposed for PP-verbs is the following:<br />

(A.7) [ VP V [ PP P C be-/al DP]]<br />

This structure underlies the occurrence of the discussed verbs with be-/al as PP-verbs<br />

(e.g. (A.3a)). On the assumption that these verbs can be interpreted also as Directional<br />

verbs, I propose that in addition to the structure in (A.7), they can also occur in the<br />

structure shown in (A.8). Note that both a PP and a DP are appropriate to realize<br />

Location. <strong>The</strong> former denotes a specific Location (e.g. under the table), the latter<br />

(e.g. the table) is interpreted as Location if introduced by a Locative or Directional P:<br />

(A.8) [ VP V [ PP P dir PP/DP location ]] 67<br />

Consider the following, which supports the Directional analysis of these verbs.<br />

In Hebrew, the Directional P may remain phonetically null, when its locative<br />

complement is a PP headed by a locative P such as under. However, if the location is<br />

expressed by a DP, rather than by a locative PP, the typical Directional P-morpheme<br />

le-/el (‘to’) appears. This is illustrated in (A.9): 68<br />

67 This structure reflects Jackendovian representation of change of location verbs, where a PATH<br />

predicate takes Location as its complement (Jackendoff 1990) (see also chapter 4). <strong>The</strong> syntactic<br />

hierarchy between the Directional and Locative Ps is argued extensively in Koopman 2000, as well as<br />

in Van Riemsdijk and Huybregts 2001.<br />

68 <strong>The</strong> fact that the Directional morpheme le-/el (‘to’) does not have to surface if a Locative P is present<br />

may indicate that the relation which licenses the empty Directional P is probably between the<br />

Directional and Locative P-heads. Whether this relation is best viewed as head-movement is a separate<br />

question.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!