The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
102<br />
(A.6) a. mabat-o nadad<br />
(motion)<br />
glance-his wandered<br />
“His glance wandered.”<br />
b. hu taka bi mabat niz’am (change of location)<br />
he stuck in+me glance furious<br />
“He stuck in me a furious glance.”<br />
c. hu he’if le-evr-i mabat niz’am (direction)<br />
he threw to-side-mine glance furious<br />
“He threw in my direction a furious glance.”<br />
Recall that the structure proposed for PP-verbs is the following:<br />
(A.7) [ VP V [ PP P C be-/al DP]]<br />
This structure underlies the occurrence of the discussed verbs with be-/al as PP-verbs<br />
(e.g. (A.3a)). On the assumption that these verbs can be interpreted also as Directional<br />
verbs, I propose that in addition to the structure in (A.7), they can also occur in the<br />
structure shown in (A.8). Note that both a PP and a DP are appropriate to realize<br />
Location. <strong>The</strong> former denotes a specific Location (e.g. under the table), the latter<br />
(e.g. the table) is interpreted as Location if introduced by a Locative or Directional P:<br />
(A.8) [ VP V [ PP P dir PP/DP location ]] 67<br />
Consider the following, which supports the Directional analysis of these verbs.<br />
In Hebrew, the Directional P may remain phonetically null, when its locative<br />
complement is a PP headed by a locative P such as under. However, if the location is<br />
expressed by a DP, rather than by a locative PP, the typical Directional P-morpheme<br />
le-/el (‘to’) appears. This is illustrated in (A.9): 68<br />
67 This structure reflects Jackendovian representation of change of location verbs, where a PATH<br />
predicate takes Location as its complement (Jackendoff 1990) (see also chapter 4). <strong>The</strong> syntactic<br />
hierarchy between the Directional and Locative Ps is argued extensively in Koopman 2000, as well as<br />
in Van Riemsdijk and Huybregts 2001.<br />
68 <strong>The</strong> fact that the Directional morpheme le-/el (‘to’) does not have to surface if a Locative P is present<br />
may indicate that the relation which licenses the empty Directional P is probably between the<br />
Directional and Locative P-heads. Whether this relation is best viewed as head-movement is a separate<br />
question.