The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
91<br />
<strong>The</strong> group in (98) is not meant to exhaust the group of [-c] Hebrew PP-verbs, but<br />
rather to illustrate the situation which obtains in this group (the more exhaustive list of<br />
verbs appears in Appendix B). As can be seen from (98), although there are some<br />
Hebrew [-c] verbs which surface as PP-verbs in English (and Russian), many others<br />
do not surface as such in English. <strong>The</strong> question is why there are [-c] verbs in English<br />
which appear without a preposition. What makes it possible? Before I provide the<br />
answer for the raised question, some words of clarification regarding the realization of<br />
the [-c] role are necessary.<br />
3.5.2.1 <strong>The</strong> [-c] cluster and Dative Case: In sections 3.2 and 3.3 it is argued that<br />
Hebrew PP-verbs are associated with [P C ] (rather than with [Acc]), which is realized<br />
by small Ps, whose function is to check the Case of the nominal. Thus P C is viewed as<br />
a Case-checking device.<br />
Based on the observation that many [-c] verbs in Russian appear with a Dative<br />
DP, I propose that in some languages Dative Case, rather than a small P, may be used<br />
when a given two/three-place verb is not marked with [Acc]. 58 This is stated in (99):<br />
(99) Dative Case on a par with P C is a device to check the Case of the nominal<br />
argument of an Accusative-less verb.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are many intriguing questions regarding Dative Case. For example, is it<br />
inherent or structural Case? How is it realized syntactically across languages, and to<br />
what extent is its mapping to grammatical functions and thematic roles predictable<br />
(Kayne 1984; Emonds 1985; Franks and Greenberg 1988; Baker 1997; Bayer et al.<br />
2001; Maling 2001, among many others)? Needless to say that addressing these<br />
questions will take us too far aside. For our purposes it suffices to understand the<br />
differences between the realization of the [-c] cluster as a PP and as a Dative<br />
argument. I propose that the difference between the Dative Case device and the small<br />
58 See also Reinhart (2000, 2001) where it is suggested that [-c] is typically realized as Dative Case or<br />
as a PP. It should be noted that although Dative Case is the typical Case of [-c] arguments, it is not<br />
restricted to [-c] arguments. As for the PP realization of the [-c] role, various small Ps may occur, not<br />
necessarily the typical Goal P such as to.