12.09.2014 Views

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

The Category P Features, Projections, Interpretation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

81<br />

Since the [-m] role is not so familiar, I will first discuss the basic motivation to<br />

analyze these verbs as [-m] assigning verbs. I will then show that the internal role<br />

assigned by these verbs is indeed distinct from both [-c-m] and [+c-m] roles.<br />

3.4.4.1 Basic motivation: <strong>The</strong> group of Subject Experiencer hitpa’el verbs<br />

consists of verbs such as mit’anyen be- ([is] ‘interested in’]), which have a causative<br />

alternate (me’anyen ‘causes interest’). 46 This is exemplified below in (77). <strong>The</strong><br />

availability of the causative alternate (77a) highlights the characteristic of the [-m]<br />

role to be perceived as cause. <strong>The</strong>refore these verbs are the most straightforward<br />

candidates for assigning a [-m] role. 47<br />

(77) a. balšanut [-m] me’anyenet et dan<br />

Linguistics interests Acc Dan<br />

b. dan mit’anyen be-balšanut [-m]<br />

Dan [is] interested in-linguistics<br />

Let us now consider a verb such as hitxaret (al) (‘regretted’) (78a), which does<br />

not have a causative alternate (78b), and examine whether it too can be classified as a<br />

[-m] verb.<br />

(78) a. dan hitxaret al ma’asav<br />

Dan regretted on deeds-his<br />

“Dan regretted his deeds.”<br />

b. *ma’asav hixritu/xirtu et dan<br />

deeds-his [caused] regret Acc Dan<br />

Intended meaning: His deeds caused Dan regret<br />

46 See Reinhart (2000, 2001), where it is argued that the hitpa’el entry is derived from the transitive<br />

entry by a lexical operation which reduces the external [+c] theta-role.<br />

47 <strong>The</strong>se verbs probably belong to the group of Object Experiencer verbs such as do’eg (‘worries’),<br />

discussed in Reinhart 2001, for which the [-m] role is motivated. <strong>The</strong> difference between verbs such as<br />

hit’anyen (‘was interested’), hitkaša (‘had difficulty’), which are viewed here as core PP-verbs, and<br />

verbs such as worry is that the [-m] role of the former is obligatory (e.g. dan hit’anyen *(be-balšanut),<br />

‘Dan was interested *(in linguistics)’), whereas this role is optional with the latter (e.g. dan do’eg (livri’uto),<br />

‘Dan worries (about his health’)).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!