11.09.2014 Views

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

centrals at the current length or shorten them? Do we<br />

use direct composite in-office or send the case out to<br />

the lab for porcelain restorations? Does the patient want<br />

teeth whitening? These were all appropriate options, and<br />

the suitable treatment depended on the patient’s desires.<br />

Deciding on these factors would not only impact the<br />

cosmetic outcome, but also influence the clinical treatment.<br />

Figure 5: Simulated photo showing treatment with the diastema left in<br />

place<br />

At this point, I decided visual communication using digital<br />

imaging would simplify the decision-making process.<br />

Using Adobe ® Photoshop ® Elements (Adobe Systems; San<br />

Jose, Calif.), an off-the-shelf photo manipulation software,<br />

I completed several simulations of the various treatment<br />

options. The first simulation showed repairs made to tooth<br />

#8 and #9 using direct bonding, leaving the diastema in<br />

place (Figs. 5, 6). The second simulation showed porcelain<br />

veneers being used to repair tooth #8 and #9 and close the<br />

diastema (Figs. 7, 8). The final simulation showed the patient<br />

what his teeth would look like if he whitened them (Fig. 9).<br />

After seeing all treatment possibilities, the patient decided<br />

to whiten his teeth followed by having porcelain veneers<br />

placed on tooth #8 and #9 that would close the diastema.<br />

The patient whitened his teeth for about two weeks and<br />

then allowed two weeks for rebound (Fig. 10).<br />

Figure 6: Close-up simulated photo of first treatment option<br />

Figure 7: Simulated photo showing second treatment option, closing the<br />

diastema<br />

Clinical Technique<br />

The decision was made to utilize feldspathic porcelain<br />

veneers. Feldspathic veneers require only 0.5 mm of facial<br />

reduction and 1 mm of incisal reduction for adequate<br />

strength and beauty. Feldspathic veneers are layered and<br />

allow the characterizations and color to be built deep within<br />

the restoration. This combination yields a conservative, yet<br />

vital result.<br />

After achieving adequate anesthesia, the teeth were<br />

prepared using the “connect-the-dots” approach. First, a<br />

0.5 mm depth-cutting bur (LVS1 [Brasseler USA; Savannah,<br />

Ga.]) was used to ensure minimum thickness on the facial<br />

surface (Fig. 11), and incisal depth cuts were placed to ensure<br />

minimal incisal reduction (Fig. 12). Incisal depth cuts were<br />

not necessary on tooth #9 because it was being lengthened.<br />

Next, preparations were made for closing the diastema.<br />

When closing a diastema, the preparation margins must<br />

be placed subgingival interproximally and carried to the<br />

lingual to allow for a proper emergence profile. A twogrit<br />

diamond bur (LVS3, Brasseler USA) was used for final<br />

margination (Fig. 13).<br />

Figure 8: Close-up simulated photo of second treatment option<br />

Porcelain restorations require rounded preparations that<br />

are free of sharp angles and unsupported enamel. A coarse<br />

polishing disk (EP2, Brasseler USA) was used to round<br />

all line angles and sharp edges to ensure a smooth final<br />

preparation (Fig. 14).<br />

64 www.chairsidemagazine.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!