PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Dr. Michael DiTolla: I’ve always admired Ultradent and what<br />
you guys have done because you’ve brought a lot of common<br />
sense to dentistry. You’ve taken some product categories<br />
and dispensing systems that needed cleaning up and really<br />
made things easier for those of us out there practicing. One<br />
of your newer products that came across my desk the other<br />
day is UltraCem (Ultradent; South Jordan, Utah), your resinreinforced<br />
glass ionomer (RRGI) cement. I’ve always felt like<br />
this was a product category that could use another product<br />
or two in it. It’s far from the sexiest product in dentistry, but<br />
it seemed like there were only two companies dominating the<br />
market. So not only did you come out with a traditional crown<br />
& bridge cement, but you put it into a dispensing system that is<br />
so novel, it could only be from Ultradent. Can you share a little<br />
bit about the development process?<br />
Dr. Dan Fischer: Sure. Most of the credit on that syringe<br />
mixing device for the liquid and powder goes to our young<br />
team in R&D that picked up on the passion of the ease<br />
of use of a syringe. If you think about it, a syringe is one<br />
of the simplest hydraulic devices on the planet. But to be<br />
able to mix a liquid and a powder brings so much to the<br />
equation, on the logic that no paste-paste resin-modified<br />
glass ionomer (RMGI)* can be as strong as a pure liquidpowder<br />
— you just can’t get enough of the glass ionomer<br />
powder into a resin-based system.<br />
MD: So when you guys started development of UltraCem, you<br />
already realized that, in order to have the best physical properties<br />
for this cement, you were essentially going to have to take<br />
*RRGI and RMGI are used interchangeably in this interview.<br />
Ketac-Cem - 3M ESPE<br />
RelyX Luting Plus - 3M ESPE<br />
RelyX Luting - 3M ESPE<br />
GC FujiCEM - GC America<br />
GC Fuji PLUS - GC America<br />
UltraCem - Ultradent<br />
Bond Strengths of Popular Luting Cements<br />
3.65 MPa<br />
4.36 MPa<br />
5.25 MPa<br />
5.12 MPa<br />
4.76 MPa<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />
Metal Button Shear to Dentin<br />
a step back to a powder-liquid and move away from the pastebased<br />
systems?<br />
DF: Yep. In fact, if you look at what was the strongest RMGI<br />
out there prior to UltraCem, it was GC’s FujiCEM , and that<br />
is a liquid-powder mix in a capsule. And it’s the same with<br />
3M ESPE RelyX Luting Cement; their strongest RMGI is<br />
still a liquid-powder mix in a capsule. As soon as you have<br />
to go to paste-paste, you lose the opportunity to get the<br />
amount of the glass ionomer silica in there that you’d like<br />
to have for creating a very strong cement.<br />
There was something else we realized, which we feel puts<br />
this product into its own distinctive category, Mike, and<br />
that is: RMGI is so fabulous for bonding to metal, and it<br />
is wonderful for bonding to zirconia, especially with the<br />
zirconia primer. But to really bond well to dentin and enamel,<br />
you need to have a minimal dwell time of the polyacrylic<br />
against the dentin to be able to etch it. That’s why UltraCem<br />
comes only in a regular set. If we were to bring it out in a<br />
fast set, it wouldn’t have that dwell time. But by having that<br />
dwell time, you have the first self-etching, resin-modified<br />
glass ionomer, which gives us a bond strength that more<br />
than doubles GC Fuji’s, which was the strongest heretofore.<br />
MD: You said a couple things there that I want to touch on.<br />
So the paste-paste delivery system, which has kind of become<br />
the norm — I think it’s probably the biggest seller in the<br />
category — it sounds like that was designed more for the<br />
dentist’s convenience than for the quality of the cement that<br />
comes from that mix. Is that right?<br />
10.89 MPa<br />
Courtesy of Ultradent Products Inc.<br />
DF: Absolutely. It’s been the same<br />
name of the game for 90 percent of<br />
the bonding agents out there: they<br />
have been designed more for the<br />
dentist’s convenience. Tragically, in<br />
that process, we’ve had some great<br />
fourth- and fifth-generation bonding<br />
agents that have kind of been pushed<br />
aside, with the dentist running to<br />
the single bottles and the like, many<br />
of which, Mike, give one-fourth to<br />
one-half the bond strength of what a<br />
non-compromising adhesive can<br />
provide. So you take something like<br />
Clearfil SE (Kuraray America Inc.;<br />
New York, N.Y.) or OptiBond ® (Kerr<br />
Corporation; Orange, Calif.) or our<br />
Peak ® (Ultradent) — these are a handful<br />
of what I call “non-compromising<br />
adhesives” — and these can give an<br />
adhesion to dentin at around 65 to<br />
75 percent of the actual strength of<br />
the dentin. Yet so many adhesives<br />
designed in the sense of speed can<br />
38 www.chairsidemagazine.com