11.09.2014 Views

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dr. Michael DiTolla: I’ve always admired Ultradent and what<br />

you guys have done because you’ve brought a lot of common<br />

sense to dentistry. You’ve taken some product categories<br />

and dispensing systems that needed cleaning up and really<br />

made things easier for those of us out there practicing. One<br />

of your newer products that came across my desk the other<br />

day is UltraCem (Ultradent; South Jordan, Utah), your resinreinforced<br />

glass ionomer (RRGI) cement. I’ve always felt like<br />

this was a product category that could use another product<br />

or two in it. It’s far from the sexiest product in dentistry, but<br />

it seemed like there were only two companies dominating the<br />

market. So not only did you come out with a traditional crown<br />

& bridge cement, but you put it into a dispensing system that is<br />

so novel, it could only be from Ultradent. Can you share a little<br />

bit about the development process?<br />

Dr. Dan Fischer: Sure. Most of the credit on that syringe<br />

mixing device for the liquid and powder goes to our young<br />

team in R&D that picked up on the passion of the ease<br />

of use of a syringe. If you think about it, a syringe is one<br />

of the simplest hydraulic devices on the planet. But to be<br />

able to mix a liquid and a powder brings so much to the<br />

equation, on the logic that no paste-paste resin-modified<br />

glass ionomer (RMGI)* can be as strong as a pure liquidpowder<br />

— you just can’t get enough of the glass ionomer<br />

powder into a resin-based system.<br />

MD: So when you guys started development of UltraCem, you<br />

already realized that, in order to have the best physical properties<br />

for this cement, you were essentially going to have to take<br />

*RRGI and RMGI are used interchangeably in this interview.<br />

Ketac-Cem - 3M ESPE<br />

RelyX Luting Plus - 3M ESPE<br />

RelyX Luting - 3M ESPE<br />

GC FujiCEM - GC America<br />

GC Fuji PLUS - GC America<br />

UltraCem - Ultradent<br />

Bond Strengths of Popular Luting Cements<br />

3.65 MPa<br />

4.36 MPa<br />

5.25 MPa<br />

5.12 MPa<br />

4.76 MPa<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />

Metal Button Shear to Dentin<br />

a step back to a powder-liquid and move away from the pastebased<br />

systems?<br />

DF: Yep. In fact, if you look at what was the strongest RMGI<br />

out there prior to UltraCem, it was GC’s FujiCEM , and that<br />

is a liquid-powder mix in a capsule. And it’s the same with<br />

3M ESPE RelyX Luting Cement; their strongest RMGI is<br />

still a liquid-powder mix in a capsule. As soon as you have<br />

to go to paste-paste, you lose the opportunity to get the<br />

amount of the glass ionomer silica in there that you’d like<br />

to have for creating a very strong cement.<br />

There was something else we realized, which we feel puts<br />

this product into its own distinctive category, Mike, and<br />

that is: RMGI is so fabulous for bonding to metal, and it<br />

is wonderful for bonding to zirconia, especially with the<br />

zirconia primer. But to really bond well to dentin and enamel,<br />

you need to have a minimal dwell time of the polyacrylic<br />

against the dentin to be able to etch it. That’s why UltraCem<br />

comes only in a regular set. If we were to bring it out in a<br />

fast set, it wouldn’t have that dwell time. But by having that<br />

dwell time, you have the first self-etching, resin-modified<br />

glass ionomer, which gives us a bond strength that more<br />

than doubles GC Fuji’s, which was the strongest heretofore.<br />

MD: You said a couple things there that I want to touch on.<br />

So the paste-paste delivery system, which has kind of become<br />

the norm — I think it’s probably the biggest seller in the<br />

category — it sounds like that was designed more for the<br />

dentist’s convenience than for the quality of the cement that<br />

comes from that mix. Is that right?<br />

10.89 MPa<br />

Courtesy of Ultradent Products Inc.<br />

DF: Absolutely. It’s been the same<br />

name of the game for 90 percent of<br />

the bonding agents out there: they<br />

have been designed more for the<br />

dentist’s convenience. Tragically, in<br />

that process, we’ve had some great<br />

fourth- and fifth-generation bonding<br />

agents that have kind of been pushed<br />

aside, with the dentist running to<br />

the single bottles and the like, many<br />

of which, Mike, give one-fourth to<br />

one-half the bond strength of what a<br />

non-compromising adhesive can<br />

provide. So you take something like<br />

Clearfil SE (Kuraray America Inc.;<br />

New York, N.Y.) or OptiBond ® (Kerr<br />

Corporation; Orange, Calif.) or our<br />

Peak ® (Ultradent) — these are a handful<br />

of what I call “non-compromising<br />

adhesives” — and these can give an<br />

adhesion to dentin at around 65 to<br />

75 percent of the actual strength of<br />

the dentin. Yet so many adhesives<br />

designed in the sense of speed can<br />

38 www.chairsidemagazine.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!