11.09.2014 Views

Chairside - Glidewell Dental Labs

Chairside - Glidewell Dental Labs

Chairside - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Repair,<br />

Don’t<br />

Replace<br />

Part 1<br />

Resurfacing an Existing Porcelain Fused to<br />

Metal Restoration with a Porcelain Veneer<br />

– ARTICLE and CLINICAL PHOTOS by<br />

Robert A. Lowe<br />

DDS, FAGD, FICD, FADI, FACD, FIADFE<br />

Introduction: The Porcelain “Repair”<br />

Repairing a broken porcelain (or porcelain-fused-to-metal)<br />

restoration is a clinical reality in every dentist’s practice.<br />

The traditional technique is to use composite resin to repair<br />

chipped porcelain. This is an attempt to use unlike materials<br />

to accomplish a long-term repair, but it rarely works.<br />

Early “porcelain repair kits” used 37 percent phosphoric<br />

etch, silane primer, and adhesive and composite resin to<br />

repair chipped porcelain. This system did not work because<br />

37 percent phosphoric acid cannot appreciably etch a<br />

porcelain surface. Without adequate micromechanical retention<br />

to affix the composite resin to the porcelain surface,<br />

any repair will likely not withstand the forces of mastication.<br />

The use of hydrofluoric acid provides an adequate etched<br />

surface to create an improved micromechanical bond of<br />

composite to porcelain. However, the bond of composite<br />

to porcelain is not the only clinical problem. Another is the<br />

finishing and polishing of the porcelain-composite interface.<br />

Regardless of the finishing and polishing technique and<br />

materials used, the fine line of demarcation between the<br />

composite and porcelain is hard to eradicate.<br />

Repair, Don’t Replace – Part 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!