11.09.2014 Views

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Letters to the Editor<br />

Dear Dr. DiTolla,<br />

Is BruxZir ® Solid Zirconia (<strong>Glidewell</strong> Laboratories)<br />

indicated for inlays/onlays as well as<br />

crowns? I only hear it mentioned for crowns.<br />

For patients that insist on tooth-colored restorations<br />

on second molars, what do you<br />

place, if anything? I love IPS e.max ® (Ivoclar<br />

Vivadent; Amherst, N.Y.), but I draw the line<br />

at the first molars forward.<br />

– Jeffrey L. Schultz, DDS, FAGD<br />

Bellaire, Texas<br />

Dear Jeff,<br />

BruxZir Solid Zirconia can be used for<br />

inlays and onlays, as well as crowns.<br />

We have dentists asking us for BruxZir<br />

veneers as well, which we can do, but I<br />

am waiting for some bond strength research<br />

to conclude before we make any<br />

recommendations. Veneers are essentially<br />

non-retentive preps, so we need<br />

to ensure that our cementation/bonding<br />

protocol is sufficient to retain them.<br />

For tooth-colored restorations on second<br />

molars, BruxZir Solid Zirconia is<br />

the only choice. However, you need<br />

to have at least 0.5 mm of occlusal reduction.<br />

I have a 0.6 mm depth-cutting<br />

bur in my kit that I use for these restorations,<br />

and by the time I finish the<br />

6<br />

www.chairsidemagazine.com<br />

reduction it will usually be at 0.7 mm.<br />

At 0.5 mm, you must reduce the opposing<br />

if the occlusion is high on the<br />

restoration; otherwise, the BruxZir restoration<br />

can fail. Cast gold still holds<br />

the title as the best second molar restoration,<br />

but you know as well as I do<br />

that most patients will not accept it.<br />

Hope that helps!<br />

– Mike<br />

Dear Dr. DiTolla,<br />

I’m totally blown away by “Chairside Live,”<br />

which I was intrigued to watch for the first<br />

time when you interviewed Gordon [Christensen]<br />

— I believe it was Part 3. First, let<br />

me congratulate you on the entire concept,<br />

which I found entertaining, informative and<br />

just plain fun to watch. You and Megan<br />

remind me of the old Dan Aykroyd-Jane<br />

Curtin SNL “Point/Counterpoint” parody. In<br />

any event, great job! I loved your retching<br />

skit at the end — hilarious!<br />

But you know you and your guest can’t<br />

spew out data without skeptical Michael<br />

(that’s me) chiming in. As far as Gordon’s<br />

claim that various drinks such as lemonade<br />

are 10-times more damaging to the external<br />

stain on BruxZir zirconia than Coca-Cola,<br />

a quick search (Yahoo Answers, NEWTON<br />

Ask-a-Scientist) found that the pH of Coke<br />

is 2.5, while lemonade is 3.8. On the other<br />

hand, another site (21st Century <strong>Dental</strong>) lists<br />

Country Time Lemonade as having a pH of<br />

2.5 and Coke Classic at 2.53. Gordon also<br />

mentioned energy drinks being worse than<br />

Coke, but this latter site found that Gatorade<br />

has a pH of 2.95. Bottom line: It’s very<br />

hard for me to believe that these drinks are<br />

worse than Coke when it comes to dissolving<br />

external ceramic stains, and 10-times<br />

worse? Nah! Even if pH is not the be-all and<br />

end-all factor, 10-times worse is still hard<br />

to believe.<br />

You also stated that Multilink ® Automix<br />

(Ivoclar Vivadent) was “self-etching,” but in<br />

fact, it’s the primers in the kit that are selfetching,<br />

not the cement itself. Minor point,<br />

perhaps, but your viewers could possibly<br />

have come away thinking that Multilink<br />

Automix is similar to RelyX Unicem (3M<br />

ESPE; St. Paul, Minn.), which, of course,<br />

it’s not.<br />

In any event, you again came up with a terrific<br />

idea, which I have to admit I’m jealous I<br />

didn’t think of first!<br />

– Michael Miller, DDS<br />

Houston, Texas<br />

Dear Michael,<br />

Wow, coming from you that is quite<br />

an honor! I have such respect for<br />

what you do at REALITY (www.<br />

realityesthetics.com), and it means<br />

a lot when one of my mentors takes<br />

the time to write a letter like this. You<br />

might even see your letter read on<br />

“Chairside Live,” which would earn<br />

you a signed picture of Megan and<br />

me. I’ll be sure to mark it with a dotted<br />

line so you can cut me out of the<br />

picture. Plus, addressing your letter on<br />

the show will give me the chance to<br />

prove I know the difference between<br />

self-etching resin cements and selfadhesive<br />

resin cements.<br />

Gordon was referring to an AGD study<br />

in their journal, General Dentistry (von<br />

Fraunhofer JA, Rogers MM. Effects of<br />

sports drinks and other beverages on<br />

dental enamel. Gen Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;<br />

53(1):28-31).<br />

After that episode aired, a viewer sent<br />

me this link, http://fit4maui.com/water/<br />

pu/bottled_ph.html, which purports to<br />

measure the pH of different brands<br />

of bottled water. Could Aquafina and<br />

Dasani really have a pH of 4?<br />

Thanks again for the kind words,<br />

Michael! They mean the world to me.<br />

– Mike<br />

Dear Dr. DiTolla,<br />

I have followed some of your CE courses online.<br />

I see that you are a fan of SpeedCEM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!