PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DH: Yes, refusal to delegate is one thing. Another sort of<br />
related symptom is refusal to cross-train. A lot of these<br />
people come off as perfectionists. They tell the dentists<br />
that if somebody else does it and messes it up, then they<br />
have to fix it. In the meantime, your cash flow suffers<br />
because all these claims have been sent to the wrong<br />
place. The employee convinces the dentist that he or she<br />
is a perfectionist, which generally we consider a positive<br />
with employees rather than a negative characteristic. So the<br />
dentist tends to be receptive to this argument and the thief<br />
gets away with it.<br />
MD: It has to be even more confounding for a dentist to have an<br />
employee with all these fantastic traits that they wish all their<br />
employees had, and then to find a knife in their back with that<br />
employee’s fingerprints on it. Are you aware of some dentists<br />
who have been embezzled from multiple times?<br />
DH: Definitely. In fact, once you’ve been embezzled from<br />
once, the probability of you being a repeat victim is actually<br />
higher than the general dental population. About two-thirds<br />
of recorded embezzlement is from people who have already<br />
been a victim. The probability goes up from 50 to 60 percent<br />
to something closer to 70 percent.<br />
MD: How do you explain that?<br />
DH: I think the short answer is that some dentists are<br />
probably easier to steal from than others. What makes them<br />
easier to steal from could be anything from personality to<br />
how they run their office to who else is working in the<br />
office. There could be a lot of factors. Again, the chances<br />
of hiring a bad apple in your career are pretty good. The<br />
chances of hiring two are also pretty good.<br />
MD: Once somebody in the office is caught and nothing about<br />
the way the office is run changes, do you think it gives other<br />
people in the office the idea to do the same thing?<br />
DH: I don’t think that is what happens. I think five years<br />
goes by, somebody else gets hired and that person steals.<br />
The not checking the day sheet thing is a little bit of a red<br />
herring. But if I’m a nice, easygoing dentist, for example,<br />
the staff might get the idea that they can steal from me<br />
without me really doing anything, because I’m just way too<br />
nice. So I think if one staff member can form that opinion<br />
about a dentist, so can two or three more.<br />
MD: Let’s say I think I’m having an issue in my office and I give<br />
you a call. Can you tell me a little bit about what the process is<br />
like after that?<br />
DH: Sure. The first thing we do is have somebody reasonably<br />
senior at my company interview the dentist to see what the<br />
dentist is seeing, and just try to validate that there could<br />
be a problem. Sometimes we get dentists who don’t really<br />
think there is a problem, but they have an employee who<br />
did one thing to them once three years prior that they<br />
think could be symptomatic of stealing. We usually tell that<br />
doctor that if this person is embezzling, they’re going to see<br />
more manifestations than one instance three years ago. We<br />
try to help the dentist sort out what the employee is doing<br />
“<br />
One message I’ll give<br />
your readers is that it is<br />
really important to have<br />
individual logins for your<br />
practice management<br />
soft ware. Some offices<br />
have what I call the<br />
‘unicode,’ a single code<br />
that everybody uses to<br />
log in with, which makes<br />
it very tough for us to<br />
track who is doing the<br />
dirty stuff.<br />
”